Branchoria UFOs and UAP by Country UFOs and UAP by Country

Compare sightings, records, and explanations across UN member countries.

What Does Afghanistan's UFO Record Actually Show?

Afghanistan has a surprisingly thin UFO record. The strongest material consists of one Cold War-era Project Blue Book file from January 1956 and a US military infrared clip reportedly recorded in the region in November 2020. Neither provides verified evidence of an extraordinary craft.

111 sources 3 graphics
Preview for What Does Afghanistan's UFO Record Actually Show?

Introduction

Beyond those records, Afghanistan’s UFO history is dominated by unverified military anecdotes, poorly documented internet reports and at least one widely circulated video conclusively exposed as fabricated. This does not mean that every unusual observation over Afghanistan has been explained. It means the surviving evidence is too fragmented to support confident claims about a distinctive national phenomenon, let alone extraterrestrial visitation. The useful question is therefore not whether Afghanistan has “UFO stories”, but which reports have traceable records, original data and credible corroboration.

What Does Afghanistan's UFO Record Actually... illustration 1

What the documented chronology actually contains

January 1956: reports from several Afghan regions

The earliest substantial official record is a three-page US Air Force Project Blue Book case file dated 24 January 1956. Information reached the United States through an air attaché and a local news release issued in Kabul. The file referred to reports from “various parts” of Afghanistan rather than a single observation, suggesting a brief cluster of stories circulating nationally or through provincial administrative channels.[govweird]govweird.comafghanistan january 1956 28964717Project Blue Book: Afghanistan, January 1956 · govweird…Published: january 1956

According to the surviving summary, witnesses described objects of different shapes, including round and square forms. The most striking allegation came from a provincial governor, who reportedly said that a metallic object approximately 15 metres around had landed near a town. It was described as having small, thick glass windows and supposedly being prepared for transport to Kabul. No subsequent message confirmed that the object existed, was recovered or ever reached the capital.[govweird]govweird.comafghanistan january 1956 28964717Project Blue Book: Afghanistan, January 1956 · govweird…Published: january 1956

Project Blue Book classified the case as insufficient data for evaluation. That wording is important. It did not certify the reports as unexplained after a complete technical investigation; it recorded that investigators lacked the information needed to identify or assess them. The file contains no photographs, physical samples, radar information, named eyewitness interviews or documented inspection of the alleged landed object.[govweird]govweird.comafghanistan january 1956 28964717Project Blue Book: Afghanistan, January 1956 · govweird…Published: january 1956

The geographical wording is also too vague to support a reliable map of regional activity. Kabul appears as the reporting and intended transport centre, but the surviving record does not clearly identify all the provinces or towns where objects were allegedly seen. The case therefore establishes that flying-saucer reports circulated in Afghanistan in 1956, not that a nationwide wave was independently verified.

The long archival gap

No comparably well-documented Afghan sequence emerges from the publicly accessible Project Blue Book material or from the major modern reporting databases. This gap should not automatically be interpreted as secrecy. Afghanistan had limited civil-aviation coverage, uneven press preservation, low public access to international reporting organisations and decades of conflict that disrupted archives and communications.

Language and collection bias also matter. Prominent UFO databases are largely built from voluntary reports submitted through English-language websites. The National UFO Reporting Center, for example, describes its databank as an independently collected archive of first-hand witness submissions rather than an official or systematically sampled national survey. Low representation in such a database cannot establish a genuinely low rate of sightings in Afghanistan.[nuforc.org]nuforc.orgData Bank | NUFORC - Latest UFO SightingsSeptember 6, 2021 — The NUFORC Databank is the largest independently collected set of UFO / UAP…Published: September 6, 2021

Conversely, scattered online testimony cannot establish a hotspot. Without consistent population coverage, reporting channels and verification standards, apparent differences between Kabul, Kandahar, eastern border regions or remote northern provinces may reflect where foreign troops, journalists and internet-connected observers happened to be located.

The Truth Behind Afghanistan's UFO Sightings

Channel: Good Stories

Open on YouTube

November 2020: military infrared footage

The most important recent Afghan-linked record is a 47-second infrared video titled by its uploader “Spherical UAP over AFG in and out of clouds 23 Nov 2020”. The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO—the Pentagon office responsible for investigating unidentified anomalous phenomena—assesses that the imagery was probably captured by an infrared sensor aboard a US military platform operating within the wider US Central Command area in November 2020.[DVIDS]dvidshub.netVideo - DOW-UAP-PR055, "Spherical UAP over AFG in and out of clouds 23 Nov 2020"…

The clip shows a small area of contrast moving across the image and becoming indistinct against the background. Edited portions add zooming, sharpening, motion tracking, contrast enhancement and reduced playback speed before a short section labelled as the original video appears. AARO explicitly states that the media had been digitally altered before being uploaded to a classified network.[DVIDS]dvidshub.netVideo - DOW-UAP-PR055, "Spherical UAP over AFG in and out of clouds 23 Nov 2020"…

The chronology of custody weakens the case considerably. Although the footage is dated November 2020, an unidentified user did not upload it to the classified network until June 2024. AARO says that many records in the collection from which it was recovered lack a substantiated chain of custody. The public description does not identify the original sensor platform, operator, precise coordinates, range, object size, wind conditions or simultaneous radar detections.[DVIDS]dvidshub.netVideo - DOW-UAP-PR055, "Spherical UAP over AFG in and out of clouds 23 Nov 2020"…

AARO has not presented the clip as proof of a structured spherical craft. Its public notes deliberately avoid an analytical conclusion about the event’s validity, nature or significance. The wording supports only a limited finding: a military-related infrared clip exists, it was labelled as having been taken over Afghanistan, and the visible feature cannot be confidently identified from the released material alone.[DVIDS]dvidshub.netVideo - DOW-UAP-PR055, "Spherical UAP over AFG in and out of clouds 23 Nov 2020"…

Why Afghanistan is unusually difficult terrain for identification

Afghanistan’s physical and military environment creates conditions in which ordinary objects can appear extraordinary, particularly through distant or infrared sensors.

Mountain ridges frequently obscure an observer’s horizon and make it difficult to judge distance, altitude and speed. A nearby slow-moving object and a distant fast-moving object can produce similar angular motion when range is unknown. Dust, haze, cloud layers and strong temperature contrasts can further reduce the reliability of visual or thermal imagery.

The country’s airspace during the international intervention also contained military aircraft, helicopters, surveillance platforms, drones, illumination rounds and other objects that civilian observers could not readily identify. Some flights were classified or operationally sensitive, making immediate public clarification unlikely. “Unidentified” in this setting may therefore mean that a witness or later viewer lacked access to flight information, not that the object was beyond conventional technology.

Infrared video creates additional traps. Apparent shape can be influenced by sensor resolution, digital sharpening, image stabilisation, glare and the difference in temperature between an object and its background. Without range data, even basic estimates of diameter and velocity become speculative. Scientific proposals for rigorous UAP investigation consequently emphasise simultaneous measurements—such as multiple cameras, radar-derived range, spectral information, acoustic sensors and environmental data—rather than isolated clips.[arXiv]arxiv.orgThe Scientific Investigation of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) Using Multimodal Ground-Based ObservatoriesMay 29, 2023…Published: May 29, 2023

These limitations apply directly to the 2020 video. Claims that its indistinct feature was a huge disc, moved under intelligent control or lacked conventional propulsion go beyond what the released frames establish. The official record contains neither a validated size estimate nor the full sensor and flight metadata needed to reconstruct its motion.

7:18

Disc-shaped UAP caught on camera by the military in 2020

Channel: NBC News · Views: 1.0M · Uploaded: June 2025 · Length: 7 minutes

Open on YouTube

The most famous Afghan UFO video was fabricated

In May 2014, a dramatic video spread online under a title claiming that a UFO had attacked a Taliban camp in Afghanistan. It appeared to show a triangular craft hovering close to the ground and firing shortly before a series of enormous explosions. Some news outlets repeated the Afghanistan attribution before the source footage was properly checked.[Stars and Stripes]stripes.comOpen source on stripes.com.

The deception was comparatively easy to expose. Military aviation specialists noted that the hovering object’s position, the supposed weapons flashes and the direction of the explosions did not match one another. The added craft appeared soft and unstable while the underlying battlefield footage remained sharper. Most decisively, researchers located the original explosion sequence without the UFO; the viral version had reversed the footage and placed a computer-generated object over it.[Stars and Stripes]stripes.comOpen source on stripes.com.

The underlying scene was reported to show a real strike on a car-bomb production site in Iraq, not an extraterrestrial attack in Afghanistan. The uploader, “Section 51”, had also published numerous sensational military-UFO clips, giving viewers further reason to question provenance before treating the video as evidence.[Business Insider]businessinsider.comBusiness Insider Viral Video of 'UFO' Attack in Afghanistan Is a HoaxBusiness InsiderViral Video of 'UFO' Attack in Afghanistan Is a Hoax - Business Insider…

This episode remains significant because copies and still images can circulate after the debunking has been detached from them. A repost may carry a new title, altered date or invented location, creating the false impression of several independent Afghan incidents. In reality, duplicated or relabelled media can make a country’s UFO record look much richer than it is.

Military testimony: interesting but rarely testable

Personal accounts from soldiers and contractors form much of Afghanistan’s modern UFO folklore. These stories commonly describe lights dividing into several objects, sudden changes of direction, silent triangular formations or luminous spheres observed from isolated bases at night. Some witnesses had professional experience with aircraft or military operations, which can make their testimony worth recording.

Professional background, however, does not replace instrument data. Even an experienced observer may lack range, scale and a stable reference point when watching lights against a dark sky. Memory can also change as an account is retold, especially when no contemporary written report, sensor log or independent testimony survives.

The strongest testimony would include a dated operational record, precise location, weather conditions, original imagery, sensor settings, radar data and statements collected separately from multiple witnesses. Most publicly circulating Afghanistan stories lack several or all of these elements. They should therefore be classified as unverified witness reports, not confirmed unexplained incidents.

Accounts published years after the alleged event deserve particular care. They may be sincere, but elapsed time makes it harder to recover aircraft movements, satellite positions, meteorological records or military activities that could test the observation. Anonymous retellings copied through paranormal websites or social media carry still less evidential weight because neither the witness nor the source history can be examined.

Original document
Project Blue Book report - 1956-01-7340421-Afghanistan Untitled
Project Blue Book report - 1956-01-7340421-AfghanistanProject Blue Book · Wikimedia Commons · 1956-01 · 132925666This is the only candidate that directly depicts the specific Afghanistan Project Blue Book file referenced in the article, making it the most relevant primary document.Public domain ·View original record

The evidence ledger for Afghanistan’s UFO record

The available Afghan material becomes clearer when “confirmed” refers to the existence of a record rather than confirmation of an extraordinary object.

Confirmed records

  • A Project Blue Book case file records Afghan flying-saucer reports in January 1956. Its final assessment was insufficient data, and no recovery was verified.[govweird]govweird.comafghanistan january 1956 28964717Project Blue Book: Afghanistan, January 1956 · govweird…Published: january 1956
  • AARO released a military-related infrared clip labelled as depicting a spherical UAP over Afghanistan on 23 November 2020. AARO says the footage was altered before investigators received it and lacks a fully substantiated chain of custody.[DVIDS]dvidshub.netVideo - DOW-UAP-PR055, "Spherical UAP over AFG in and out of clouds 23 Nov 2020"…
  • Numerous anecdotal military accounts associated with Afghanistan have been published, although publication confirms only that a claim was made.

Contested or unresolved claims

  • The object reported as landed in 1956 remains historically unresolved because no follow-up evidence appears in the case file.
  • The visible feature in the 2020 infrared video remains unidentified in the released material, but “unidentified” does not indicate a confirmed physical sphere, advanced vehicle or extraterrestrial origin.
  • Soldiers’ accounts of fast-moving or dividing lights may describe genuine observations, but the available public evidence usually cannot distinguish aircraft, drones, flares, balloons, astronomical objects, sensor effects or misperceived motion.

Debunked claims

  • The 2014 “UFO attacks Taliban camp” video was assembled from pre-existing strike footage with a digitally added craft and a false or unsupported Afghan attribution.[Stars and Stripes]stripes.comOpen source on stripes.com.

No publicly available Afghan case presently combines a secure chain of custody, calibrated multisensor measurements, independently verified witnesses and physical evidence while also excluding conventional explanations.

What Does Afghanistan's UFO Record Actually... illustration 2

What official archives can and cannot prove

The National Archives and Records Administration holds UFO and UAP material across numerous US government record groups, including Project Blue Book records. It has also established a dedicated Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Collection under the 2024 US National Defense Authorization Act, with additional agency records intended to be transferred and released on a rolling basis.[National Archives]archives.govNational ArchivesRecords Related to Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) and Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAPs) at the National Archiv…

These collections may eventually produce further Afghanistan-related material, particularly from the two decades of US military operations there. Yet archival appearance alone should not be mistaken for official endorsement. Government files frequently preserve rumours, press clippings, preliminary intelligence reports and unresolved observations because agencies were required to collect or assess them.

A document’s evidential value depends on what it contains:

  • High value: original sensor data, identifiable witnesses, contemporary reports, precise times and coordinates, calibrated measurements and a documented custody history.
  • Moderate value: official summaries based on named sources but lacking original technical data.
  • Low value: press clippings, anonymous allegations, undated copies, edited media and second-hand retellings.
  • Very low value: social-media reposts whose claimed date, place and source cannot be traced.

The 1956 Afghanistan file sits in the moderate-to-low range: it is an authentic official record but preserves poorly substantiated reports. The 2020 video has greater technical interest because it originated within a military context, yet its alteration, delayed upload and missing metadata sharply restrict what can be inferred from it.

AARO UAP Infrared Sensor Footage | Spherical UAP Over Afghanistan 2020

Channel: Siam Astronomy

Open on YouTube

Regional patterns remain uncertain

Available evidence does not support a defensible ranking of Afghan UFO activity by province. Kabul appears prominently because it was the country’s administrative and diplomatic centre, not necessarily because it generated more anomalous observations. The 1956 stories were collected through Kabul, and the supposed recovered object was reportedly destined for the capital, but its original location remains inadequately documented.[govweird]govweird.comafghanistan january 1956 28964717Project Blue Book: Afghanistan, January 1956 · govweird…Published: january 1956

Kandahar and other southern or eastern regions appear frequently in modern military folklore because they hosted intensive aviation, surveillance and combat operations. That produces two competing effects: more trained observers and sensors were present, but there were also far more conventional military objects to misidentify. Conflict-zone secrecy further prevents easy checking of individual flights or exercises.

Remote mountainous regions might seem well suited to unexplained phenomena, yet sparse population and limited communications reduce both observation and reporting. A cluster of online stories from a heavily staffed base may therefore reveal more about observer density and internet access than about the actual geographical distribution of unusual aerial events.

A credible regional analysis would require a standardised dataset containing observation times, locations, viewing conditions, sensor types and case resolutions. No such Afghanistan-wide public dataset is presently available.

How to assess a new Afghan sighting

A new claim should first be tested through provenance rather than appearance. Dramatic-looking footage is weak evidence when its origin is unknown; an unremarkable-looking clip with original files and complete metadata may be much more useful.

The essential questions are:

  1. Can the original source be identified? Reposts, screen recordings and edited compilations may conceal alterations.
  2. Are the date and location independently verifiable? Mountain silhouettes, base layouts, weather and astronomical conditions can sometimes confirm or contradict an attribution.
  3. Is the complete recording available? Very short excerpts can remove contextual motion, nearby aircraft or the moment an object is recognised.
  4. What sensor produced it? Infrared, night-vision and ordinary cameras create different artefacts.
  5. Is range known? Without it, claims about size, speed and acceleration are generally unreliable.
  6. Was anything else recorded? Radar, a second camera, flight logs or separately collected witness statements can transform a weak report into a testable event.
  7. Has the imagery been processed? Sharpening, stabilisation, interpolation and contrast enhancement may create apparent edges or movement that are not present in the source.
  8. Do earlier copies tell a different story? Reverse-image and frame searches can reveal that supposedly Afghan media originated elsewhere.

The 2014 hoax failed several of these checks almost immediately. The 2020 military clip passes the basic test that an official body possesses and has released it, but fails crucial tests involving unbroken custody, original data and sufficient metadata. The 1956 case passes archival authentication while failing verification of the underlying claims.

What Does Afghanistan's UFO Record Actually... illustration 3

Reading the evidence around Afghanistan’s UFO record conservatively

Afghanistan has an authentic but extremely limited documentary UFO history. Its central cases are not equal: the 1956 episode is a record of remarkable but unconfirmed reports; the 2020 infrared footage is a genuine investigative artefact whose content and provenance remain too uncertain for a physical conclusion; and the best-known viral “attack” video is a demonstrated fabrication.

There is presently no strong public evidence that Afghanistan experienced a verified landing, recovery or encounter with technology exhibiting capabilities beyond known human systems. Nor is there enough consistent reporting to identify meaningful regional hotspots. The unresolved cases remain unresolved mainly because decisive information is missing—not because conventional explanations were tested and defeated.

That distinction preserves both scepticism and openness. Poor evidence should not be inflated into proof, but an unidentified observation should not be assigned an explanation without adequate data. For Afghanistan, the historical record is best understood as a small collection of genuine documents, uncertain observations and recycled war-zone mythology whose evidential quality varies sharply from case to case.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to What Does Afghanistan's UFO Record Actually Show?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Browse more on Amazon: In Plain Sight: an Investigation Into UFOs and Impossible Science UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record The UFO Experience

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

UsingUSA

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: govweird.com
Title: afghanistan january 1956 28964717
Link:https://www.govweird.com/topics/ufo/project-blue-book/afghanistan-january-1956-28964717

Source snippet

Project Blue Book: Afghanistan, January 1956 · govweird...

Published: january 1956

2. Source: nuforc.org
Link:https://nuforc.org/databank/

Source snippet

Data Bank | NUFORC - Latest UFO SightingsSeptember 6, 2021 — The NUFORC Databank is the largest independently collected set of UFO / UAP...

Published: September 6, 2021

3. Source: nuforc.org
Title: Browse reports, images, videos, maps and more
Link:https://nuforc.org/

Source snippet

National UFO Reporting Center | Report a UFO | Report a UAPThe most trustworthy, transparent and respectful organization for UFO/UAP witn...

4. Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18566

Source snippet

The Scientific Investigation of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) Using Multimodal Ground-Based ObservatoriesMay 29, 2023...

Published: May 29, 2023

5. Source: stripes.com
Link:https://www.stripes.com/news/2014-05-09/is-video-proof-that-aliens-hate-the-taliban-1831261.html1

6. Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps

Source snippet

National ArchivesRecords Related to Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) and Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAPs) at the National Archiv...

7. Source: nuforc.org
Link:https://nuforc.org/map/

8. Source: nuforc.org
Title: NUFOR C Reports by Location NUFORC Reports by Location; USA
Link:https://nuforc.org/ndx/?id=loc

9. Source: nuforc.org
Link:https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=198001

10. Source: war.gov
Title: department of war publishes second release of unidentified anomalous phenomena
Link:https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4499305/department-of-war-publishes-second-release-of-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena/

11. Source: war.gov
Title: Department of War Releases Unidentified Anomalous
Link:https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4480582/department-of-war-releases-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-files-in-historic-t/

12. Source: war.gov
Link:https://www.war.gov/ufo/

13. Source: war.gov
Title: department of war publishes third release of unidentified anomalous phenomena f
Link:https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4515408/department-of-war-publishes-third-release-of-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-f/

14. Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/declassification/iscap/pdf/2014-004-doc01.pdf

15. Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/08/20050803.html

16. Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/guides/still-pictures-guide

17. Source: archives.gov
Title: presidential libraries
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/presidential-libraries

18. Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050310-14.html

19. Source: archives.gov
Title: Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos

20. Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Link:https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/category/audio-recordings/page/2/

21. Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050304-9.html

22. Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/photographs

23. Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2007/11/20071101-1.html

24. Source: archives.gov
Title: uap bulk download
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/catalog-bulk-downloads/uap-bulk-download

25. Source: archives.gov
Title: 07 21 2015 meeting transcript
Link:https://www.archives.gov/ogis/foia-advisory-committee/2014-2016-term/documents/07-21-2015-meeting-transcript

26. Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050304-15.html

27. Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050311-2.html

28. Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050321-7.html

29. Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050321-8.html

30. Source: stripes.com
Title: pentagon ufo files release 21612115
Link:https://www.stripes.com/theaters/us/2026-05-08/pentagon-ufo-files-release-21612115.html

31. Source: history.com
Title: area 51 top secret spy planes u2 blackbird
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/area-51-top-secret-spy-planes-u2-blackbird

32. Source: dvidshub.net
Link:https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1007713/dow-uap-pr055-spherical-uap-over-afg-and-out-clouds-23-nov-2020

Source snippet

Video - DOW-UAP-PR055, "Spherical UAP over AFG in and out of clouds 23 Nov 2020"...

33. Source: businessinsider.com
Title: Business Insider Viral Video of ‘UFO’ Attack in Afghanistan Is a Hoax
Link:https://www.businessinsider.com/ufo-afghanistan-video

Source snippet

Business InsiderViral Video of 'UFO' Attack in Afghanistan Is a Hoax - Business Insider...

34. Source: dvidshub.net
Link:https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1007741/dow-uap-pr064-afsoc-kabul-uap-jul-2017

35. Source: dvidshub.net
Title: DVID S
Link:https://www.dvidshub.net/

36. Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: reqdec10 3.csv
Link:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a78dc3ced915d07d35b2fe5/reqdec10_3.csv

37. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/06984637

38. Source: fox2detroit.com
Link:https://www.fox2detroit.com/video/1663075

Additional References

39. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp67-00059a000100030001-6

40. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/05578084

41. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/INFORMATION%20REVIEW%20%26%20RELE%5B15598822%5D.pdf

42. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005517469.pdf

43. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp87m01007r000400810001-4

44. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/0005517532

45. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp79b00752a000300070001-8

46. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKYWrakDclw

Source snippet

US Fighter Jets Battle UFOs Over Afghanistan?!?...

47. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06X_wCn-y8g

Source snippet

U.S. Hellfire Missile Bounces Off UFO in Footage Released in House Hearing...

Published: March 2014

48. Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/%40omarvferro/drone-or-ufo-613aebf7aca9

Source for page image:Project Blue Book report - 1956-01-7340421-Afghanistan · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain