Separating Reports From Evidence in Lithuania

Lithuania has a modest but revealing UFO record: a few nationally remembered incidents, scattered witness reports and one unusually well-documented police encounter, but no strong public evidence of extraterrestrial craft.

91 sources 3 graphics
Preview for Separating Reports From Evidence in Lithuania

Introduction

The central difficulty is not a shortage of strange-looking lights. It is the absence of calibrated measurements, radar corroboration, original imagery with dependable provenance and publicly accessible investigative files. Lithuania’s UFO history is therefore best understood as a hierarchy of evidence: documented incidents, unresolved observations, contested narratives and cases that have been convincingly explained.

Overview image for What Really Happened in Lithuania's UFO...

Lithuania’s UFO chronology

Lithuanian reports do not form a continuous, well-maintained national archive. Instead, the chronology is reconstructed from Soviet-era material, foreign intelligence reporting, local journalism and voluntary international databases. Four periods stand out.

20 September 1977 — the wider Petrozavodsk phenomenon. A large wave of luminous observations was reported across northern Europe and the Soviet Union. One sighting was recorded at Palanga on Lithuania’s Baltic coast at about 3 a.m. The wider event helped prompt a Soviet programme for studying anomalous atmospheric phenomena. Although early investigators considered the information inconclusive, the principal display has subsequently been associated with the launch of the Kosmos 955 satellite, whose illuminated exhaust plume could appear exceptionally large in the pre-dawn sky. Lithuania’s role in this episode was peripheral: Palanga was one observation point within a geographically extensive event, not the centre of a separate Lithuanian encounter.[Wikipedia]WikipediaPetrozavodsk phenomenonPetrozavodsk phenomenon

January 1991 — disputed footage over central Vilnius. A later documentary claimed that Soviet personnel using night-vision equipment had filmed an unusual luminous object near the Lithuanian parliament and, in a related sequence, around the Vilnius television tower during the January independence crisis. The material became widely known only after appearing in a foreign television programme years later. Lithuanian institutions reportedly had no contemporary record of a UFO, while local physicists subsequently argued that the effect resulted from luminous or image-producing night-vision equipment. The missing original chain of custody, delayed publication and dependence on programme narration make this a weak case despite its dramatic historical setting.[Lrytas]lrytas.ltVis plačiau tyrinėjami NSO: ufologas priminė žymiausius atvejus LietuvojeVis plačiau tyrinėjami NSO: ufologas priminė žymiausius atvejus Lietuvoje…

25 June 1996 — the Nemėžis police encounter. Two duty patrol officers, Jaunius Požera and Laimis Kraujalis, reported a spherical phenomenon near Nemėžis, beside the road towards Medininkai south-east of Vilnius. According to the transmitted account, the object appeared roughly 20–30 metres above the ground, alternately expanded and contracted, and was accompanied by a sound likened to an electric motor or crackling electricity. The officers watched for approximately half an hour before the phenomenon departed rapidly towards Vilnius.[cia.gov]cia.govPOLICE OFFICERS SPOT UFO; RAPID REACTION…AN UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT (UFO), SPOTTED NEAR THE LITHUANIAN BORDER ON 25 JUNE BY TWO…

The report brought police reinforcements, rapid-response officers, dogs and civil-defence personnel to the area. Investigators reportedly recorded continuing sounds and examined flattened vegetation, but found no object, debris or other decisive trace. A senior police official later suggested that weather could have flattened the grass and that animals in a nearby pond might have produced the sounds. No publicly available radar record, instrument reading, photograph, recovered material or laboratory result establishes what the officers saw.[Lrytas]lrytas.ltVis plačiau tyrinėjami NSO: ufologas priminė žymiausius atvejus LietuvojeVis plačiau tyrinėjami NSO: ufologas priminė žymiausius atvejus Lietuvoje…

October 2023 — three lights over north-eastern Vilnius. Residents in Antakalnis, Valakampiai and nearby districts described three bright points that moved, flashed and disappeared. Witnesses considered lanterns, drones, military activity and celestial bodies. A local report checked publicly visible civil-aircraft movements and a planetarium programme, finding neither an obvious commercial flight nor a matching bright astronomical grouping at the reported time. That narrowed the simple possibilities but did not determine range, altitude or physical size, and it did not exclude drones, distant aircraft lacking public tracking, lanterns viewed under misleading perspective or other local sources.[MadeinVilnius.lt]madeinvilnius.ltUFOs are recorded in Vilnius: spotted even in several micro-districts (video) - MadeinVilnius.lt…

March 2025 — the Anykščiai light pillar. A conspicuous vertical glow generated UFO and missile speculation before weather observers identified it as a light pillar. Powerful greenhouse lamps illuminated plate-like ice crystals in the atmosphere, producing an apparently suspended column of light. Similar effects have been reported near Elektrėnai, where extensive greenhouse lighting can create striking displays under suitable atmospheric conditions. This is Lithuania’s clearest recent example of a visually impressive “UFO” being resolved through local environmental knowledge.[MadeinVilnius.lt]madeinvilnius.ltMysterious pillar of light captured in Lithuanian sky: what was it really? - MadeinVilnius.lt…

What Really Happened in Lithuania's UFO... illustration 1

Why the 1996 encounter matters most

The Nemėžis incident is stronger than Lithuania’s other famous cases because its basic occurrence is supported by contemporaneous institutional reporting. The declassified document hosted in the United States Central Intelligence Agency’s reading room is a translated foreign-media or broadcast report collected through the Foreign Broadcast Information Service. It records the officers’ names, the reported date, location and emergency response. That makes it useful evidence that Lithuanian police treated an unusual report seriously.[CIA]cia.govPOLICE OFFICERS SPOT UFO; RAPID REACTION…AN UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT (UFO), SPOTTED NEAR THE LITHUANIAN BORDER ON 25 JUNE BY TWO…

It is important, however, to distinguish an archived intelligence document from a CIA investigation. The document does not show that American intelligence officers examined the site, verified the witnesses’ distance estimates or concluded that an extraordinary vehicle was present. Intelligence archives routinely preserve translations of foreign news and official statements because they may have political, military or social value. Classification or later declassification says nothing by itself about the truth of the underlying UFO interpretation.

Several details increase the case’s interest:

  • The principal witnesses were serving police officers rather than anonymous online contributors.
  • The sighting reportedly lasted long enough for continued observation rather than a momentary flash.
  • A substantial official response followed.
  • The account included visual, acoustic and possible ground-trace elements.
  • The location near Lithuania’s eastern approaches gave authorities a practical reason to consider an aircraft, surveillance device or security threat.

Yet the evidence also has serious limitations. Nearly every striking measurement—including the alleged altitude, dimensions and motion—appears to have been estimated visually at night. Without a known distance, apparent expansion can result from changing brightness, focus, haze or movement towards and away from an observer. The reported ground trace was not shown to have been caused by the object, and the sound could not be securely linked to the visual phenomenon. Contemporary local reporting also preserves an explicitly sceptical police interpretation involving weather and pond wildlife.[Lrytas]lrytas.ltVis plačiau tyrinėjami NSO: ufologas priminė žymiausius atvejus LietuvojeVis plačiau tyrinėjami NSO: ufologas priminė žymiausius atvejus Lietuvoje…

The appropriate verdict is therefore documented but unresolved, not confirmed alien technology. The witnesses evidently reported something they could not identify, and the police response appears genuine. The surviving public record is insufficient to reconstruct the event scientifically or to choose confidently among an unusual atmospheric effect, an aircraft or balloon, a perceptual error, a local source and a genuinely unexplained aerial object.

1:09:44

What the regional pattern really shows

Available reports appear concentrated around Vilnius and its surrounding district. The 1991 footage claim, the 1996 Nemėžis encounter, the 2021 and 2023 online reports and many entries in voluntary databases are attached to the capital region. This should not be interpreted as evidence that UFOs favour Vilnius. The city has Lithuania’s largest population, denser news coverage, more cameras, busier controlled airspace and a larger online audience, all of which increase both observations and reporting.

The Nemėžis–Medininkai area also has a distinctive security geography. It lies south-east of Vilnius near routes leading towards the Belarusian border. In that setting, an unidentified light or aircraft can reasonably attract a faster response than the same observation over an isolated field. The 1996 mobilisation may therefore reveal more about post-Soviet border vigilance than about the physical strangeness of the object.

Reports outside the capital show different explanatory pressures. Palanga’s 1977 sighting belonged to a long-range space-launch display visible across northern Europe. Anykščiai and Elektrėnai provide conditions for artificial-light pillars because bright agricultural installations interact with ice crystals. Kaunas and other cities appear in self-submitted databases, but these entries generally lack independent investigation and cannot establish a meaningful regional rate. The National UFO Reporting Center’s Lithuania page, for example, includes recent reports classified by witnesses as discs, circles or unusual drones, but the records are submissions rather than verified detections.[NUFORC]nuforc.orgReports for Country LithuaniaNUFORC Reports for Country LithuaniaAugust 20, 2023 — Reports for Country 'Lithuania' Vilnius Vilniaus apskritis Lithuania Disk Ope…Published: August 20, 2023

Lithuania’s apparent regional variation is consequently better explained by population, observation conditions, infrastructure and reporting channels than by any demonstrated concentration of anomalous craft.

Official records are thinner than they appear

The CIA-hosted 1996 item is often described online as a “declassified CIA UFO file”. That description is technically tempting but potentially misleading. Its evidential value lies in preserving a contemporaneous report, not in proving that the CIA endorsed or solved the incident. The document should be read as an archival lead pointing back to Lithuanian witnesses and authorities.

No comparable, publicly searchable Lithuanian collection has emerged that resembles the long-running UFO files released by some foreign defence ministries. Publicly visible Lithuanian material instead remains fragmented among newspaper archives, television programmes, individual enthusiasts and foreign databases. This fragmentation prevents researchers from answering basic questions such as how many reports were made to police, how many were referred to aviation authorities, what proportion were explained and whether original photographs or recordings survive.

Soviet-era Lithuanian observations pose an additional archival problem. Before independence, reports could be collected through military, scientific or security structures operating across the Soviet Union rather than through a specifically Lithuanian institution. The Soviet state did establish programmes to study “anomalous atmospheric phenomena”, particularly after the 1977 wave, but surviving summaries indicate that those efforts mixed genuine aerospace-security concerns with incomplete witness material and secrecy surrounding missile and satellite operations.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orghistory of state ufo research in the ussrSkeptical InquirerA History of State UFO Research in the USSRIn the mid-1970s various government organizations involved in the study of U…

Private collections can preserve otherwise forgotten testimony, but they require careful handling. A database entry may accurately reproduce what a witness submitted while offering no evidence that the event happened as described. Likewise, a television documentary can contain authentic footage yet attach an unsupported date, location or interpretation. Provenance—the documented history of where evidence came from and how it was handled—is especially important in Lithuania’s 1991 case because the footage surfaced outside a transparent contemporary investigation.

What Really Happened in Lithuania's UFO... illustration 2

Claims, explanations and evidence in Lithuania’s UFO record

Lithuania’s principal incidents fall into three useful evidence categories.

Confirmed as reports or responses

  • Police officers reported an unidentified spherical phenomenon near Nemėžis on 25 June 1996.
  • Lithuanian emergency or police units responded and searched the area.
  • Residents reported unusual lights over north-eastern Vilnius in October 2023.
  • A luminous vertical feature was photographed near Anykščiai in March 2025.

These statements concern the existence of reports, witnesses or official activity. They do not confirm an exotic object.

Contested or unresolved

  • The physical identity of the 1996 Nemėžis phenomenon remains undetermined in the surviving public evidence.
  • The three-light formation seen over Vilnius in 2023 lacked enough positional and instrumental data for a secure identification.
  • The alleged January 1991 object over the parliament remains disputed because the footage’s provenance and original technical context are uncertain.

Explained or substantially weakened

  • The Anykščiai display was identified as a light pillar created by greenhouse illumination and atmospheric ice crystals.[MadeinVilnius.lt]madeinvilnius.ltMysterious pillar of light captured in Lithuanian sky: what was it really? - MadeinVilnius.lt…
  • The wider 1977 Petrozavodsk display, including the Lithuanian observation at Palanga, has a strong space-launch explanation connected with Kosmos 955, even though some historical accounts disputed whether one launch explained every report in the wider wave.[Wikipedia]WikipediaPetrozavodsk phenomenonPetrozavodsk phenomenon
  • The 1991 Vilnius footage claim was substantially weakened by the absence of corroborating institutional records and by accounts attributing the images to night-vision equipment.[Lrytas]lrytas.ltVis plačiau tyrinėjami NSO: ufologas priminė žymiausius atvejus LietuvojeVis plačiau tyrinėjami NSO: ufologas priminė žymiausius atvejus Lietuvoje…

This division prevents two common errors: treating every unexplained observation as an alien craft, and treating every flawed case as proof that witnesses invented what they saw. A report can be sincere and remain unidentified simply because the available information is inadequate.

57:35

The explanations most relevant to Lithuania

Lithuania’s landscape and airspace create several recurring sources of misidentification.

Atmospheric optics. Ice crystals can reflect strong ground lighting into pillars, patches or apparently suspended structures. Temperature inversions and layered cloud can distort the position or apparent movement of distant lights. The Anykščiai case shows that an explanation may depend on knowing what illuminated facility lies beneath the display.[MadeinVilnius.lt]madeinvilnius.ltMysterious pillar of light captured in Lithuanian sky: what was it really? - MadeinVilnius.lt…

Satellites and rocket launches. Spacecraft, re-entering debris and illuminated rocket exhaust can be visible across several countries. The Petrozavodsk episode demonstrates how a launch conducted far from Lithuania can produce a striking observation over the Baltic coast. Such displays are especially deceptive around twilight, when an observer is in darkness but material at high altitude remains sunlit.[Wikipedia]WikipediaPetrozavodsk phenomenonPetrozavodsk phenomenon

Aircraft and drones. Lithuania’s civil and military aviation environment includes commercial routes, training activity, helicopters, border surveillance and an increasing number of privately operated drones. Public flight-tracking services cover many aircraft but not every military, police, private or uncooperative target. The absence of a matching symbol on a consumer tracking site therefore cannot by itself rule out aviation.

Lanterns, balloons and local lighting. Points of light drifting together can appear to accelerate when clouds move, when the observer changes position or when individual lights extinguish. Distance is almost impossible to judge against an empty night sky, so a small nearby object can be perceived as a large remote one.

Astronomical objects. Bright planets, stars near the horizon, meteors and satellite trains are frequently reported as moving or changing colour because of atmospheric turbulence and involuntary eye movement. A planetarium programme can test an astronomical hypothesis, but the witness’s exact direction, time and unobstructed viewpoint must be known.

These explanations are not interchangeable excuses. Each makes testable predictions about direction, duration, wind, weather, brightness and motion. Good investigation consists of comparing those predictions with the original observation rather than merely selecting the most familiar label.

What Really Happened in Lithuania's UFO... illustration 3

How reliable Lithuanian sources should be judged

The strongest source for a Lithuanian case is not necessarily the most official-looking webpage. Reliability depends on what the source can actually establish.

A contemporaneous police report can confirm who called, what was described and how authorities responded. It cannot automatically establish the object’s altitude or origin. An intelligence translation can preserve that report but may introduce summarisation or translation errors. A local newspaper can locate witnesses and competing explanations, while also relying on dramatic framing. A voluntary database can reveal reporting patterns but cannot measure the true frequency of unexplained phenomena.

For any Lithuanian sighting, five questions sharply improve the assessment:

  1. Is the original record available? Later retellings often add details absent from the first account.
  2. Is the date and location secure? Undated or relabelled footage has little investigative value.
  1. Were there independent observation points? Several people standing together do not provide the same geometric information as witnesses kilometres apart.
  2. Was anything measured? Radar range, calibrated imagery, weather data and known reference objects are more useful than estimates of speed or size.
  3. Were ordinary explanations checked at the time? Aircraft, satellites, launches, drones, balloons, astronomical objects and local lighting become harder to reconstruct years later.

Modern scientific proposals for UAP research emphasise synchronised wide- and narrow-field cameras, triangulation, radar, radio-frequency monitoring, acoustic sensors and environmental measurements. The purpose is not to assume extraordinary technology, but to convert a fleeting visual claim into an event that can be independently tested. None of Lithuania’s famous public cases contains that full evidential package.[arXiv]arxiv.orgOpen source on arxiv.org.

5:09

What remains genuinely unexplained

The 1996 Nemėžis encounter remains Lithuania’s clearest unresolved UFO case because credible witnesses, a prolonged observation and an official response are all part of the record. Its unresolved status is nevertheless limited: it means that the surviving information does not identify the cause, not that known explanations were eliminated.

The 2023 Vilnius lights also remain unidentified in the narrow sense, but the evidence is weaker. Witness descriptions and video clips of points of light generally cannot determine distance or performance. Apparent rapid manoeuvres may be real, but without triangulation or stable reference points they cannot be quantified.

The strongest overall conclusion is that Lithuania has documented UFO reports but no publicly available case demonstrating technology beyond conventional human or natural causes. Its record is valuable precisely because it shows how evidence quality changes a story. The Anykščiai pillar became explainable when weather and local lighting were considered. The 1991 footage deteriorated under provenance questions. The 1996 police case retained interest because the event was contemporaneously recorded, yet stopped short of proof because decisive measurements and physical evidence were missing.

Conclusion

Lithuania’s UFO history is neither an empty collection of hoaxes nor a hidden catalogue of confirmed alien encounters. It is a small, uneven archive shaped by Soviet secrecy, post-independence security concerns, local journalism and modern online reporting.

The country’s most significant case—the 1996 Nemėžis police encounter—deserves cautious attention because the witnesses and official reaction are documented. It remains unresolved, but the declassified foreign intelligence record confirms reporting rather than an extraterrestrial explanation. The alleged 1991 Vilnius footage is much less reliable, the 1977 Palanga observation fits a wider launch-related phenomenon, and the 2025 Anykščiai “UFO” was convincingly explained as an atmospheric light pillar.

Taken together, these cases support a restrained conclusion: unusual aerial observations certainly occur in Lithuania, but the public evidence is generally too incomplete to determine what witnesses saw, and no Lithuanian incident currently provides robust proof of an exotic craft.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to What Really Happened in Lithuania's UFO Cases?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

BookCover for The UFO Experience

The UFO Experience

By Joseph Allen Hynek

Its structured classification of sightings and emphasis on witness quality, corroboration and investigative standards directly support th...

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

UsingUSA

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Endnotes

1. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000098713.pdf

Source snippet

POLICE OFFICERS SPOT UFO; RAPID REACTION...AN UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT (UFO), SPOTTED NEAR THE LITHUANIAN BORDER ON 25 JUNE BY TWO...

2. Source: lrytas.lt
Title: Vis plačiau tyrinėjami NSO: ufologas priminė žymiausius atvejus Lietuvoje
Link:https://www.lrytas.lt/it/visata/2023/10/27/news/vis-placiau-tyrinejami-nso-ufologas-primine-zymiausius-atvejus-lietuvoje-28898038

Source snippet

Vis plačiau tyrinėjami NSO: ufologas priminė žymiausius atvejus Lietuvoje...

3. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Petrozavodsk phenomenon
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrozavodsk_phenomenon

4. Source: madeinvilnius.lt
Link:https://madeinvilnius.lt/en/the-voice-of-Vilnius/In-Vilnius%2C-there-are-videos-that-are-recorded-even-in-several-micro-districts/

Source snippet

UFOs are recorded in Vilnius: spotted even in several micro-districts (video) - MadeinVilnius.lt...

5. Source: madeinvilnius.lt
Link:https://madeinvilnius.lt/en/orai-vilniuje/lietuvos-padangeje-uzfiksuotas-paslaptingas-sviesos-stulpas-kas-tai-buvo-is-tiesu/

Source snippet

Mysterious pillar of light captured in Lithuanian sky: what was it really? - MadeinVilnius.lt...

6. Source: nuforc.org
Title: Reports for Country Lithuania
Link:https://nuforc.org/subndx/?id=cLithuania

Source snippet

NUFORC Reports for Country LithuaniaAugust 20, 2023 — Reports for Country 'Lithuania' Vilnius Vilniaus apskritis Lithuania Disk Ope...

Published: August 20, 2023

7. Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18566

8. Source: Wikipedia
Title: List of reported UFO sightings
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reported_UFO_sightings

9. Source: nuforc.org
Link:https://nuforc.org/ndx/?id=loc

10. Source: nuforc.org
Link:https://nuforc.org/

11. Source: nuforc.org
Link:https://nuforc.org/map/

12. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/1992-04-01A.pdf

13. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005516692.pdf

14. Source: cia.gov
Title: FOIA CASE LOG CALENDER YE[16111550]
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/FOIA%20CASE%20LOG%20CALENDER%20YE%5B16111550%5D.pdf

15. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00789r001001420001-3

16. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/06935701

17. Source: cia.gov
Title: CIA RDP66B00403R000200190010 7
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP66B00403R000200190010-7.pdf

18. Source: madeinvilnius.lt
Title: vilniuje fiksuojami nso pastebeti net keliuose mikrorajonuose video
Link:https://madeinvilnius.lt/en/vilniecio-balsas/vilniuje-fiksuojami-nso-pastebeti-net-keliuose-mikrorajonuose-video/

19. Source: space.com
Title: mystery objects shot down ufos uap
Link:https://www.space.com/mystery-objects-shot-down-ufos-uap

20. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Title: history of state ufo research in the ussr
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/newsletter/history-of-state-ufo-research-in-the-ussr/

Source snippet

Skeptical InquirerA History of State UFO Research in the USSRIn the mid-1970s various government organizations involved in the study of U...

21. Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link:https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/explore-the-collection/explore-by-time-period/postwar/ufo-reports/

22. Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7ebee940f0b6230268b464/20140808_MOD_Acronyms_and_Abbreviations.pdf

23. Source: skeptic.com
Link:https://www.skeptic.com/michael-shermer-show/the-hardest-ufo-cases-to-dismiss-something-is-flying-around-and-we-dont-know-what-it-is/

24. Source: nidirect.gov.uk
Link:https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/articles/archives-family-and-local-history

25. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/2021/08/ufos-beliefs-conspiracies-and-aliens/

Additional References

26. Source: ovniarchive.com
Link:https://ovniarchive.com/doc/531?lang=en

Source snippet

OVNI ArchiveUFO spotted by police in Lithuania · OVNI ArchiveIn June 1996, two Lithuanian police officers spotted a spherical object near...

Published: June 1996

27. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Case Of The Baltic Sea Anomaly | The Mystery Beneath
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImV8f0pOoXQ

Source snippet

Underwater UFO explorer finds movielike object in Baltic Sea | Reality Check...

28. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbnh_Wgar6k

Source snippet

The Case Of The Baltic Sea Anomaly | The Mystery Beneath...

29. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/194044602673550/posts/1282328103845189/

30. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248984354_Deportation_Expulsion_and_the_International_Police_of_Aliens

31. Source: ru.scribd.com
Link:https://ru.scribd.com/doc/48102262/FBIS-Reporting-1996-Lithuania-UFO-Sighting-Involving-Lithuanian-Police-and-Rapid-Reaction-Forces-16-June-1996
Published: June 1996

32. Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/doc/48102262/FBIS-Reporting-1996-Lithuania-UFO-Sighting-Involving-Lithuanian-Police-and-Rapid-Reaction-Forces-16-June-1996
Published: June 1996

33. Source: nicap.org
Link:https://www.nicap.org/jufoh/JournalUFOHistoryVol2No6.pdf

34. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/govilnius.lt/posts/just-another-absolutely-ordinary-night-in-vilnius-ufos-in-vilnius-they-certainly/687265730095803/

35. Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1lpee08/leaked_classified_film_of_a_massive_pyramid/