What Really Lies Behind Ukraine's UFO Stories?
Ukraine has a genuine history of UFO reporting, organised investigation and instrument-based observation, but it does not possess a verified case demonstrating extraterrestrial technology.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
That distinction matters. A UFO—now often called an unidentified anomalous phenomenon, or UAP—is simply something not identified at the time of observation. In Ukraine, some reports remain unresolved because the records are incomplete, not because extraordinary origins have been established. The best-known cases range from a disputed 1982 missile-base incident to controversial astronomical papers published from Kyiv after 2022. Taken together, they show why national security, observational science and folklore must be assessed separately rather than folded into a single narrative.
From Soviet secrecy to Ukrainian archives
Modern Ukrainian UFO history cannot be separated neatly from the Soviet system. Reports made before independence in 1991 were usually handled through institutions based across the USSR, and surviving records may now be divided among Ukrainian, Russian, military, academic and private collections.
A Soviet state programme commonly known as Setka began after the widely reported Petrozavodsk phenomenon of September 1977. Its military branch examined possible effects on defence systems, while an Academy of Sciences branch considered physical and atmospheric explanations. Researchers associated with the programme later said that roughly 3,000 reports were studied and that most identifiable events were attributable to rocket launches, high-altitude balloons or other human activity. The programme nevertheless preserved a smaller residue of cases for which available information was insufficient.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgOpen source on skepticalinquirer.org.
Ukraine had its own institutional connection to this work. The Ukrainian Scientific Research Centre for the Study of Anomalies, known as Zond, describes itself as the intellectual successor to a Soviet-era commission on anomalous phenomena associated with the Popov Scientific and Technical Society of Radio Engineering and Communications. Ukrainian reporting dates that predecessor’s activity to the late 1970s and identifies academician Georgii Pisarenko as a leading figure. Zond itself has operated since 2004 and maintains publications, meeting records, case material and a specialist library.[zond.kiev.ua]zond.kiev.uaМеню та віджети. Бібліотека/Library · Матеріали/Materials · Протоколи/Minutes of meetings…Read more…
A second strand of preservation came from enthusiast archives. In 2009, the Ukrainian group UFODOS publicised an online collection said to contain about 500 witness accounts from locations across Ukraine, including reports retrospectively dated to earlier centuries. Such collections are useful finding aids, but their entries do not all carry equal evidential weight. Historical anecdotes, newspaper clippings, recollections recorded decades later and instrumented modern observations should not be counted as equivalent “cases”.[bukinfo.com.ua]bukinfo.com.uaarhive 4143Уфологи оприлюднили інтернет-архів свідчень про НЛО…28 Oct 2009 — Серед "секретних матеріалів" - близько 500 свідчень очевидців, які б…
This fragmented provenance is the central archival difficulty. A document may establish that somebody reported a light, disc or unusual radar return; it does not automatically establish that the reported object behaved as described. Reliable assessment requires the original statement, date, location, weather, viewing geometry, sensor information and any contemporary attempt at identification.
The cases that shaped Ukraine’s UFO story
The disputed missile-base incident of 1982
The most dramatic case associated with Soviet Ukraine allegedly occurred on 4 October 1982 near a strategic missile unit around Byelokorovychi, in what is now Zhytomyr region. Later accounts describe military personnel watching a luminous or disc-like object while indicators in a missile-control facility briefly appeared to enter a launch-related state without an authorised command.
The story became internationally known through interviews and Soviet documents obtained by American journalist George Knapp in the 1990s. In September 2025, Knapp repeated the allegation during testimony before a US congressional subcommittee, presenting it as a near-catastrophic nuclear incident.[Fox News]foxnews.comFox NewsCongressional witness claims Russian UFO incident…9 Sept 2025 — According to Knapp, he obtained documents showing that an inci…
The evidential problem is that the most consequential interpretation rests on material whose chain of custody, technical completeness and independent authentication remain disputed. Public retellings differ over the site name, duration, equipment behaviour and whether missiles were genuinely close to launch or whether control-panel lights merely displayed an abnormal sequence. No publicly available Ukrainian or Russian technical investigation has established that an unknown flying object caused the malfunction.
The incident should therefore be classified as contested, not confirmed. There appears to be a persistent documentary and witness tradition behind it, making it more than an invented internet rumour. But the available public evidence does not securely demonstrate either external interference with nuclear systems or an object of non-human origin.
Reports before and after independence
Ukraine’s wider chronology is much less spectacular. Soviet publications recorded waves of unusual-light reports, especially during periods of intensive rocket and military activity. A Ukrainian popular-science magazine discussed UFO observations over Ukraine as early as 1967, reflecting growing public interest well before glasnost made the subject easier to publish openly.[Wikipedia]WikipediaOpen source on wikipedia.org.
After independence, reports were collected primarily by civilian organisations and the media rather than through a transparent national reporting office. Zond has described receiving observations from civilians and military personnel and, according to a 2024 interview, typically obtained about 30–40 anomalous-phenomenon reports per year. That figure indicates continued public reporting, but it is not a national incidence rate: it reflects submissions to one organisation and may be shaped by publicity, internet access and the group’s own visibility.[Телеграф]news.telegraf.com.uaТелеграфІ ЗСУ, і росіяни на фронті бачать НЛО: український вченийТелеграфІ ЗСУ, і росіяни на фронті бачать НЛО: український вчений
No robust public dataset presently supports confident claims that one Ukrainian region experiences intrinsically more anomalous phenomena than another. Kyiv and Kyiv region feature prominently because they contain major research institutions, a dense population and camera networks. Wartime reports are concentrated around active military zones because those areas contain numerous drones, surveillance systems and trained observers. Archive totals may therefore map reporting opportunities more closely than any underlying phenomenon.
Kyiv’s “cosmics” and “phantoms”
The most technically ambitious Ukrainian UFO research emerged from scientists associated with the Main Astronomical Observatory of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. In a 2022 preprint, Boris Zhilyaev, Vladimir Petukhov and Volodymyr Reshetnyk described daytime observations made using meteor-monitoring cameras in Kyiv and at Vinarivka, about 120 kilometres away. They divided recorded objects into luminous “cosmics” and dark “phantoms”, estimating in some instances extreme speeds, sizes and distances.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena I. Observations of eventsarXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena I. Observations of events
A follow-up paper claimed two luminous objects had been triangulated at altitudes of approximately 620 and 1,130 kilometres, moving at 256 and 78 kilometres per second. Other short-lived dark objects were estimated at tens of metres in size and several kilometres per second in speed. The authors stated that the detections were experimental facts while declining to assign the objects a specific nature.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP propertiesarXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP properties
These numerical claims attracted international attention because, taken literally, they would imply objects with extraordinary physical characteristics. They also attracted strong methodological criticism. The crucial distances were inferred partly from colour and atmospheric contrast, meaning that small errors in assumptions about illumination, haze, camera response or object brightness could produce very large errors in estimated size and velocity.
Physicist Avi Loeb argued that the reported distances were not secured by adequate triangulation and that much closer conventional objects could reproduce the recorded angular motion. Moving an object ten or a hundred times closer would reduce its calculated size and speed correspondingly, bringing possibilities such as artillery projectiles, bullets, birds or insects into consideration.[Medium]avi-loeb.medium.com“Down To Earth” Limits on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena“Down To Earth” Limits on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
A detailed visual critique also noted that at least one dark multi-frame object resembled an insect passing close to the camera. Such “near-camera” contamination is a familiar problem in sky-monitoring work: a tiny object a few metres away can appear to cross the frame faster than a distant aircraft and may be badly blurred or distorted by exposure and focus.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical Inquirer UFOs over KyivSkeptical Inquirer UFOs over Kyiv
The papers are therefore evidence that Ukrainian cameras recorded unidentified transient objects, but not firm evidence for gigantic or technologically extraordinary craft. The observations remain contested measurements. Their importance lies less in proving exotic phenomena than in illustrating how easily distance assumptions can transform an ordinary-looking image into an apparently impossible event.
The research programme continued. Later preprints described variable objects, multi-site observations and dark targets detected in or near combat areas, including a 2025 paper that again proposed very low reflectivity, kilometre-scale dimensions and supersonic or greater velocities. These remain author claims in preprints rather than broadly validated conclusions, and the same requirements—independent calibration, simultaneous multi-sensor tracking and reproducible distance measurement—apply.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena. Observations of variable objectsarXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena. Observations of variable objects
Why wartime skies generate more unknowns
Russia’s full-scale invasion has turned Ukrainian airspace into one of the most intensively observed and technologically crowded environments in the world. Military personnel may encounter reconnaissance drones, first-person-view attack drones, decoys, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, anti-aircraft interceptors, flares, electronic-warfare effects and objects seen only through thermal cameras. A target can be genuinely unidentified to a particular crew while still being entirely human-made.
This setting creates several predictable sources of error:
- Range ambiguity: A thermal or optical image without reliable range data cannot securely establish an object’s size or speed.
- Sensor artefacts: Digital zoom, automatic gain, image sharpening, heat bloom and compression can alter outlines and make small targets appear disc-shaped or geometric.
- Perspective effects: A stationary-looking object may be moving towards or away from the observer, while the observing drone itself may also be moving.
- Classified technology: Ukrainian and Russian systems are not always publicly identifiable, even after clear imagery is recorded.
- Information warfare: Edited footage, recycled clips and sensational captions can circulate alongside genuine battlefield recordings.
A widely shared 2024 clip recorded through a Ukrainian drone system appeared to show a dark, disc-like object above a combat zone. Press coverage emphasised its apparently stationary shape, but the public footage lacked the metadata needed to determine range, dimensions or velocity. Claims that it was dozens of kilometres away depended on an on-screen estimate rather than publicly demonstrated measurement. It remains unidentified in the narrow sense, but no extraordinary conclusion follows from the clip alone.[The Scottish Sun]thescottishsun.co.ukOpen source on thescottishsun.co.uk.
By 2026, Ukrainian defence specialist Serhii Beskrestnov said the armed forces treated unusual-object reports primarily as an intelligence and air-defence issue because an unknown target might represent a new Russian weapon. He also referred to a detailed military document governing the subject and encouraged personnel to send recordings through intelligence channels. Ukrainian news reports corroborate that he made these statements, but the document itself has not been publicly released for independent examination.[Kyiv Post]kyivpost.comKyiv Post Senior Ukraine Official Reports Armed Forces Sighted UFOKyiv Post Senior Ukraine Official Reports Armed Forces Sighted UFO
This is a rational military use of the term UFO. “Unidentified” in a war zone may mean hostile, experimental or inadequately tracked—not extraterrestrial. The security value comes from reducing uncertainty quickly, regardless of the object’s eventual explanation.
What counts as strong evidence?
Ukraine’s records range from folklore-like stories to instrument readings. A useful credibility assessment separates them into three broad categories.
Confirmed observations are cases in which a witness or sensor demonstrably recorded something but its identity may still be mundane. The Kyiv meteor cameras, for example, unquestionably produced images of transients. Battlefield crews have likewise recorded objects whose immediate identities were uncertain. Confirmation of an observation is not confirmation of the observer’s distance estimate or interpretation.
Contested cases have witnesses or documents but unresolved problems in authentication, measurement or causation. The 1982 missile-base story belongs here, as do the observatory’s extreme size-and-speed calculations. These cases merit examination precisely because some underlying event may have occurred, but their strongest claims remain unverified.
Debunked or substantially explained claims are those for which a conventional mechanism fits the evidence better. In Ukrainian material, common candidates include insects close to cameras, birds, balloons, satellites, artillery, missiles, aircraft and optical or thermal-image artefacts. Soviet investigators likewise concluded that rocket launches and high-altitude balloons explained the majority of reports they could identify.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical Inquirer UFOs over KyivSkeptical Inquirer UFOs over Kyiv
A persuasive Ukrainian UAP case would ideally include synchronised recordings from separated locations; original, uncompressed files; exact timestamps; camera specifications; radar or range data; weather information; and records excluding known aircraft, satellites, launches and military operations. Multimodal observation—combining optical, infrared, radar, radio and acoustic data—is especially valuable because it allows one sensor’s ambiguity to be tested against another.[arXiv]arxiv.orgOpen source on arxiv.org.
Witness testimony remains useful, particularly when recorded promptly and independently, but memory alone cannot establish speed, distance or physical size. Human observers are generally poor at estimating the range of an isolated light against a featureless sky. Once an assumed distance is wrong, almost every derived performance claim becomes wrong with it.
What the regional pattern really shows
Ukraine does not currently have a sufficiently complete, standardised and public case database to support a scientific map of UFO “hotspots”. Apparent clusters can nevertheless be explained by the country’s geography and reporting infrastructure.
Kyiv and central Ukraine dominate technical discussion because the capital contains the Main Astronomical Observatory, major universities, dense air traffic and large numbers of cameras. Vinarivka became important because it provided a second observational station for the Kyiv research team.
Zhytomyr region is prominent largely because of the disputed 1982 strategic-missile case. Its reputation rests disproportionately on one dramatic incident rather than a demonstrated long-term concentration.
Eastern and southern combat regions produce modern military reports because they contain intensive drone and missile activity. The number of genuinely unfamiliar targets may be high, but so is the number of conventional objects capable of appearing anomalous.
Rural regions may provide darker skies and clearer views, yet they also have fewer calibrated instruments and fewer residents able to report an event. A low archive count may therefore mean low observation coverage, not low activity.
Regional variation should consequently be interpreted as variation in observers, sensors, military operations and institutional attention. Claims of persistent geographical hotspots would require reporting rates adjusted for population, camera coverage, air traffic, launches, weather and wartime activity—analysis not presently available for Ukraine.
The most reliable reading of Ukraine’s UFO record
Ukraine’s UFO history is neither empty nor evidentially revolutionary. It contains authentic institutional interest, surviving Soviet research traditions, organised civilian investigators, military reporting and unusually ambitious camera studies. It also contains severe limitations: incomplete archives, inaccessible defence material, uncertain provenance, sensational retellings and measurements that have not withstood broad independent validation.
The 1982 missile incident remains historically intriguing but technically unproven. The Kyiv “cosmic” and “phantom” papers demonstrate a serious attempt to quantify aerial anomalies, yet their extraordinary distance and velocity estimates remain vulnerable to ordinary near-camera explanations and calibration uncertainty. Wartime recordings deserve rapid defence analysis, but Ukraine’s crowded battlespace makes drones, weapons and sensor effects more probable starting points than exotic craft.
The clearest conclusion is therefore evidence-based but restrained: Ukraine has documented many things that were unidentified when reported, and a small number remain unresolved in public records. None presently provides verified evidence of extraterrestrial vehicles. The enduring value of the Ukrainian material lies in how sharply it exposes the difference between seeing an unknown object, measuring it reliably and proving what it was.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Really Lies Behind Ukraine's UFO Stories?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
In Plain Sight: an Investigation Into UFOs and Impossible Sci...
Discusses military sensor evidence and modern cases.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
Provides context for evaluating historical international cases.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Endnotes
1.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Programma Setka
Link:https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programma_Setka
2.
Source: zond.kiev.ua
Link:https://zond.kiev.ua/
Source snippet
Меню та віджети. Бібліотека/Library · Матеріали/Materials · Протоколи/Minutes of meetings...Read more...
3.
Source: bukinfo.com.ua
Title: arhive 4143
Link:https://bukinfo.com.ua/cikavynky/arhive-4143
Source snippet
Уфологи оприлюднили інтернет-архів свідчень про НЛО...28 Oct 2009 — Серед "секретних матеріалів" - близько 500 свідчень очевидців, які б...
4.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%84%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%8F
5.
Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena I. Observations of events
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.11215
6.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.11215
7.
Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP properties
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.17085
8.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.17085
9.
Source: avi-loeb.medium.com
Title: “Down To Earth” Limits on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
Link:https://avi-loeb.medium.com/down-to-earth-limits-on-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-in-ukraine-6d8bb9f64f85
10.
Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv Unidentified aerial phenomena. Observations of variable objects
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.13664
11.
Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv Unidentified Aerial Phenomena. Characterization of Dark UAPs
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05627
12.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18566
13.
Source: mao.kiev.ua
Link:https://www.mao.kiev.ua/biblio/cards/show_sources_u.php?authid=260
14.
Source: mao.kiev.ua
Title: 670 astronomicheskie nablyudeniya uap
Link:https://mao.kiev.ua/index.php/en/forum/info/670-astronomicheskie-nablyudeniya-uap
15.
Source: mao.kiev.ua
Title: zvit 2022 fsun
Link:https://www.mao.kiev.ua/docs/zvity/zvit_2022_fsun.pdf
16.
Source: mao.kiev.ua
Title: knit 2025 31 6 all
Link:https://www.mao.kiev.ua/biblio/jscans/knit/2025-31/knit-2025-31-6-all.pdf
17.
Source: mao.kiev.ua
Link:https://www.mao.kiev.ua/docs/zvity/zvit2022_richnyi.pdf
18.
Source: mao.kiev.ua
Title: knit 2024 30 6 all
Link:https://www.mao.kiev.ua/biblio/jscans/knit/2024-30/knit-2024-30-6-all.pdf
19.
Source: mao.kiev.ua
Link:https://www.mao.kiev.ua/index.php/en/forum/info/678-astronomical-observations-of-ufos
20.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: UFO sightings in Russia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_sightings_in_Russia
21.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Voronezh UFO incident
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voronezh_UFO_incident
22.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: List of reported UFO sightings
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reported_UFO_sightings
23.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Unidentified flying object
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unidentified_flying_object
24.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Історія уфології
Link:https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%86%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D1%8F_%D1%83%D1%84%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%96%D1%97
25.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Petrozavodsk phenomenon
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrozavodsk_phenomenon
26.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Institute 22
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_22
27.
Source: zond.kiev.ua
Link:https://zond.kiev.ua/page/16/
28.
Source: zond.kiev.ua
Link:https://zond.kiev.ua/page/2/
29.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/html/2503.05627v1
30.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps
31.
Source: war.gov
Title: Department of War Releases Unidentified Anomalous
Link:https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4480582/department-of-war-releases-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-files-in-historic-t/
32.
Source: war.gov
Link:https://www.war.gov/ufo/
33.
Source: history.com
Title: s most infamous ufo sightings
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/historys-most-infamous-ufo-sightings
34.
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/newsletter/history-of-state-ufo-research-in-the-ussr/
35.
Source: foxnews.com
Link:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-witness-testifies-ufos-nearly-activated-russian-nuclear-missles-during-1982-incident
Source snippet
Fox NewsCongressional witness claims Russian UFO incident...9 Sept 2025 — According to Knapp, he obtained documents showing that an inci...
36.
Source: news.telegraf.com.ua
Title: ТелеграфІ ЗСУ, і росіяни на фронті бачать НЛО: український вчений
Link:https://news.telegraf.com.ua/ukr/obshhestvo/2024-07-05/5861274-i-vsu-i-rossiyane-na-fronte-vidyat-nlo-ukrainskiy-uchenyy-soobshchil-podrobnosti
37.
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Title: Skeptical Inquirer UFOs over Kyiv
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/2022/12/ufos-over-kyiv/
38.
Source: thescottishsun.co.uk
Link:https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/12067926/ufo-floating-ukraine-warzone-drone-war/
39.
Source: kyivpost.com
Title: Kyiv Post Senior Ukraine Official Reports Armed Forces Sighted UFO
Link:https://www.kyivpost.com/post/75962
40.
Source: skeptic.com
Title: UF O Files Reveal … the Same Old Material
Link:https://www.skeptic.com/article/ufo-files-reveal-the-same-old-material/
41.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/225360538009038/posts/1959812574563817/
42.
Source: foxnews.com
Title: viral cia file about aliens attacking soldiers takes off ufo intrigue
Link:https://www.foxnews.com/us/viral-cia-file-about-aliens-attacking-soldiers-takes-off-ufo-intrigue
43.
Source: kyivpost.com
Link:https://www.kyivpost.com/post/75976
44.
Source: themoscowtimes.com
Link:https://www.themoscowtimes.com/all/52335?amp=1
45.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: George Knapp Written Testimony
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/George-Knapp-Written-Testimony.pdf
Additional References
46.
Source: globalnews.ca
Title: ufo hearing witness claims we were seconds away from wwiii in 1982 incident
Link:https://globalnews.ca/video/11405473/ufo-hearing-witness-claims-we-were-seconds-away-from-wwiii-in-1982-incident
Source snippet
Global NewsUFO hearing: Witness claims we were 'seconds away from...9 Sept 2025 — Watch UFO hearing: Witness claims we were 'seconds awa...
47.
Source: hromadske.ua
Title: НЛО, привиди та кола на полях
Link:https://hromadske.ua/posts/nlo-prividi-ta-kola-na-polyah-hto-i-navisho-doslidzhuye-anomalni-yavisha-v-ukrayini
Source snippet
Хто і навіщо досліджує...18 Jul 2021 — Український науково-дослідний центр вивчення аномалій «Зонд» існує з 2004 року. Ми — інтелектуаль...
48.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Ukrainian Astronomers Claim UFOs Spotted in Skies Above Kyiv
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owpibpiBcVY
Source snippet
Unexplained Light Flash in Kyiv Puzzles Residents...
49.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Unexplained Light Flash in Kyiv Puzzles Residents
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aYfuiV6d6U
Source snippet
UFO Caught on Camera by Ukrainian Troops Hovering Over Warzone...
50.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/ThyAnon/posts/and-he-looked-at-meand-i-looked-at-himthen-he-looked-at-me-so-i-looked-at-hiiiii/1523729995778015/
51.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/xf4i0j/cosmic_and_phantom_ufos_are_all_over_ukraines/
52.
Source: ukranews.com
Link:https://ukranews.com/en/news/1151202-the-armed-forces-of-ukraine-are-studying-ufos-which-may-be-a-new-weapon-of-the-russian-federation
53.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/Timesnow/posts/a-ukrainian-drone-attack-on-moscows-main-oil-refinery-has-fuelled-an-unexpected-/1510593311111926/
54.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/p/DLgKOX_uvNt/
55.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/p/DSUg9UIkjWq/?hl=en