Inside the UFO Record of Indonesia
Indonesia has a long and unusually varied UFO tradition, but its evidential record is much thinner than its folklore suggests. Reports range from wartime lights and alleged humanoid encounters to military-era sightings, pilot testimony, crop circles and modern phone videos.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Two cases dominate the historical narrative: the alleged humanoid encounters on Alor and Pantar in 1959, and reports of an unidentified object over the Surabaya region during the Indonesia–Malaysia Confrontation in 1964. Both are culturally important, yet neither is supported in the public domain by a complete contemporary case file containing original statements, instrument records and independently preserved physical evidence. By contrast, several recent “UFO” events have been resolved through ordinary explanations, including crop-circle construction, illuminated kites and rocket exhaust.[historia.id]historia.idbeta di langit indonesia13 Feb 2024 — AWAL Juli 1959, penduduk Kepulauan Alor geger setelah munculnya kawanan manusia ajaib: tinggi rata-rata 1,8 meter, berkulit…
How Indonesia’s UFO record developed
Indonesia’s UFO history is closely associated with Jacob Salatun, an Air Force officer and important figure in the creation of the National Institute of Aeronautics and Space, usually known by its former acronym LAPAN. Salatun popularised an Indonesian expression for unidentified flying objects, wrote books about the subject in 1960 and 1982, and later established an Indonesian UFO study organisation. His background in aviation and government gave the subject a degree of institutional prestige that it rarely enjoyed elsewhere in South-East Asia.[Wikipedia]WikipediaJacob SalatunJacob Salatun
That prestige should not be confused with an official national investigation programme comparable to the United States’ Project Blue Book. Publicly accessible Indonesian material does not reveal a continuous state-run reporting system, a standardised military database or a declassified archive through which researchers can reconstruct individual cases. Salatun’s personal interest and occasional collection of reports therefore occupy an ambiguous position: historically significant, but not equivalent to a transparent official inquiry with published methods and findings.
Civilian organisations later became the main custodians of Indonesian UFO material. BETA-UFO, founded in 1997, describes its work as documentation, investigation, research and public education. It has collected witness accounts, published case material and encouraged reporting across a geographically dispersed country. Its archive is valuable because many incidents would otherwise survive only as newspaper stories or oral recollections. At the same time, it is an enthusiast-run collection rather than a complete national surveillance dataset, and its material varies considerably in age, detail and corroboration.[scribd.com]id.scribd.comSatu Dekade BETA UFO Melacak Fenomena UFOSatu Dekade BETA UFO Melacak Fenomena UFO | PDFJ. Salatun, yang telah merintis penelitian UFO di Indonesia sejak tahun 1960-an. Sal…
A chronology of the most important claims
Published lists contain dozens of alleged Indonesian sightings, including reports from Sumatra during the Second World War, several incidents in the 1950s, cases around Jakarta and Java in the 1960s and 1970s, and later reports from Bali, Kalimantan, Sulawesi and other regions. Many entries, however, are little more than dates and locations copied between websites. A long chronology can therefore create a misleading impression of evidential depth: ten poorly documented reports are not necessarily stronger than one case with reliable records, calibrated images and multiple independent witnesses.[Wikipedia]WikipediaUFO sightings in IndonesiaUFO sightings in Indonesia
1942–1955: scattered early reports. The earliest Indonesian entries usually involve unusual lights or aerial objects reported over Sumatra, Medan, Malang and Gorontalo. These cases are difficult to assess because accessible accounts are retrospective and rarely include full contemporary documentation. Wartime observations are especially vulnerable to confusion involving aircraft, flares, searchlights, balloons, meteors and incomplete knowledge of military activity.
July 1959: Alor and Pantar. This is Indonesia’s best-known alleged close encounter. Later narratives describe several unfamiliar humanoid figures, frightened villagers, a missing child who was subsequently recovered, and police gunfire directed at the figures. The central testimony is attributed to Alwi Alnadad, identified in later accounts as a retired police officer who had served in the area.[historia.id]historia.idbeta di langit indonesia13 Feb 2024 — AWAL Juli 1959, penduduk Kepulauan Alor geger setelah munculnya kawanan manusia ajaib: tinggi rata-rata 1,8 meter, berkulit…
1964: Surabaya and the confrontation period. Salatun’s account describes an unidentified, dark object with coloured lights appearing during a period of heightened military readiness. Some versions say Indonesian forces fired on it, while falling ammunition or fragments injured people near Sidoarjo. This episode is sometimes presented as a military engagement with a UFO, but the publicly available narrative largely depends on Salatun’s later retelling rather than a released operations log, radar record or formal accident investigation.[Wikipedia]WikipediaList of reported UFO sightingsDwikora Operation UFO incident, AsiaSurabaya, Indonesia, Officer Jacob Salatun—founder of the National Inst…
1970s–1990s: expansion of the civilian catalogue. Reports were recorded from Mount Agung, Cilamaya, Porong, Jakarta, Tarakan, Bandung, Bali, Probolinggo, Salatiga and Mount Salak. The geographical spread shows that UFO reporting was not confined to Jakarta or Java, although the survival of accounts is heavily shaped by population density, media access and the activity of local enthusiasts. Most cases from this period rest primarily on eyewitness recollection rather than recoverable instrument data.[Wikipedia]WikipediaUFO sightings in IndonesiaUFO sightings in Indonesia
2000s onwards: digital evidence, but not necessarily better evidence. Mobile phones, social media and online reporting increased the number and speed of public claims. They also multiplied videos of distant lights, drones, balloons, kites, satellites and launch effects presented without enough information to establish distance, size or velocity. Digital recording has made incidents easier to share, but compressed footage and missing metadata often leave investigators with less certainty than viewers assume.
Why the Alor case remains contested
The Alor narrative is memorable because it contains elements far beyond an ordinary light in the sky: several beings, apparent interaction with residents, a missing child and police involvement. It is also tied to remote island communities, which gives the case a strong sense of place and has helped it endure in Indonesian UFO culture. Modern retellings commonly describe the figures as tall, red-skinned or reddish in appearance, with long arms, unusual hair, dark clothing and metal rods.[Historia.ID]historia.idbeta di langit indonesia13 Feb 2024 — AWAL Juli 1959, penduduk Kepulauan Alor geger setelah munculnya kawanan manusia ajaib: tinggi rata-rata 1,8 meter, berkulit…
Yet the case’s dramatic detail is not matched by equivalent documentary strength. The widely circulated versions appear to derive chiefly from recollections recorded long after 1959 and repeated through UFO publications and online summaries. Publicly accessible accounts do not provide a complete set of dated police reports, medical examinations, photographs, physical traces or separately archived statements from the villagers said to have participated.
This creates several unresolved possibilities. The story may preserve a real encounter with unidentified outsiders whose appearance and behaviour were misunderstood. It may combine local rumours, fear and later narrative elaboration. The witnesses may have experienced something unusual without the extraterrestrial interpretation being correct. It is also possible that important original records once existed but have not been digitised or publicly released.
For evidential purposes, the case should therefore be classified as a historically significant but unverified encounter narrative. It cannot fairly be dismissed as a known hoax, because no decisive fabrication has been demonstrated. Nor can it be treated as confirmed evidence of non-human visitors, because the surviving material lacks the independent documentation needed to support that conclusion.
What can be said about the 1964 Surabaya incident
The Surabaya episode is potentially more important than an ordinary civilian sighting because it allegedly involved trained observers, military units and weapons fire during the Indonesia–Malaysia Confrontation. Reports describe a dark or black object, sometimes compared to the shape of a mango, with lights that changed colour. The object was said to resist identification and to remain present despite attempted interception or firing.[Wikipedia]WikipediaList of reported UFO sightingsDwikora Operation UFO incident, AsiaSurabaya, Indonesia, Officer Jacob Salatun—founder of the National Inst…
The historical setting makes several conventional explanations plausible. Air-defence units were operating under tension, with limited night-identification technology and an expectation of hostile incursions. Aircraft seen at an unusual angle, illumination devices, balloons, astronomical objects and inaccurate range estimates could all have produced confusing reports. Weapons fire would not by itself prove that a structured object was present; anti-aircraft rounds can be fired at a suspected target that later proves to have been wrongly identified.
The strongest missing evidence is the military paper trail. A sustained engagement should normally generate duty logs, ammunition records, damage assessments, witness reports or medical documentation if civilians were injured by falling material. Until such records are located and authenticated, the incident remains an important claim attributed to a knowledgeable Indonesian aviation figure, but not a confirmed military encounter with an extraordinary craft.
Salatun’s role cuts both ways. His expertise and position make his interest harder to dismiss as casual fantasy. However, authority is not a substitute for evidence. A senior officer can accurately report that personnel saw and fired at something without being able to establish what the target actually was.
Regional patterns and their limits
Indonesia’s geography is highly relevant to UFO reporting. It combines densely populated cities, remote islands, major aviation routes, active volcanoes, equatorial weather, maritime horizons and areas with limited night-time lighting. These environments can produce unfamiliar visual effects while making independent verification difficult.
Java accounts for a large share of recorded reports, particularly around Jakarta, Yogyakarta, Bandung, Surabaya and Central Java. This probably reflects population, journalism, universities and the presence of organised UFO groups as much as any genuine concentration of anomalous phenomena. Reports from Bali similarly benefit from heavy tourism and widespread camera use.
Remote-island cases, including Alor, appear more exotic but often suffer from weaker documentation. Distance from major news centres may delay reporting, while later writers can fill gaps with details that are difficult to trace to an original witness. In eastern Indonesia and parts of Kalimantan or Sulawesi, fewer preserved reports may indicate lower reporting capacity rather than fewer unusual observations.
Indonesia’s volcanic and maritime environment also affects perception. Bright meteors, re-entering debris and rocket trails may be visible across several provinces. Atmospheric haze can distort the apparent shape and colour of lights, while objects over the sea lack familiar landmarks for estimating distance. Volcanic activity can prompt additional speculation, but no Indonesian case has produced verified evidence connecting a UFO with an eruption.
Cases that moved from mysterious to explained
The 2011 crop circles near Yogyakarta provide the clearest Indonesian example of a claim becoming more ordinary as evidence accumulated. Large geometric patterns in rice fields were initially linked by some enthusiasts to UFO activity. LAPAN specialists argued that the flattened plants, access routes and physical construction were consistent with human work rather than a landing or unknown energy source. Reports that students had participated in making a pattern further weakened the extraterrestrial interpretation.[tempo.co]tempo.cocrop circle sleman kreasi manusia dengan teknologi bumi 1764300crop circle sleman kreasi manusia dengan teknologi bumi 1764300
The episode also shows why disagreement within the UFO community matters. Some groups continued to argue that aspects of the formation were too precise or too difficult to produce overnight. Those objections were not unreasonable questions to investigate, but precision alone is not evidence of non-human manufacture. Demonstrating extraordinary origin would require measurements showing effects that available human techniques could not reproduce.
BETA-UFO’s own case reviews sometimes propose conventional explanations. In a 2010 review, one recurring luminous object was provisionally assessed as possibly being a kite fitted with light-emitting diodes, although investigators had not obtained the original video. That cautious conclusion illustrates a useful principle: “unidentified” can mean that evidence is insufficient, not that an exotic craft is the leading explanation.[Scribd]scribd.comIndonesian UFO Case Review 2010Indonesian UFO Case Review 2010
In April 2026, a glowing phenomenon seen from parts of Indonesia generated fresh UFO speculation before Indonesia’s National Research and Innovation Agency identified it as a trail associated with the launch of China’s Jielong-3 rocket. Such launch plumes can appear spiral-shaped, cloud-like or self-luminous when illuminated at high altitude, particularly around twilight. The case is a strong modern reminder that spectacular appearance and wide geographic visibility do not necessarily imply an unknown vehicle.[Jakarta Globe]jakartaglobe.idindonesias ufo sighting explained as chinese rocket trailJakarta GlobeIndonesia's 'UFO' Sighting Explained as Chinese Rocket Trail14 Apr 2026 — A glowing object seen across Indonesia sparked UFO…
The problem with photographs and video
Most modern Indonesian UFO images show a light or shape without enough contextual information to determine what it is. A single camera normally records angular movement across an image, not true speed. Without a known distance, an object that appears large and fast may instead be small and nearby. Digital zoom, autofocus, stabilisation and compression can make stars, aircraft lights and drones appear to pulse, change shape or move abruptly.
Useful analysis requires the original file rather than a copy downloaded from social media. Investigators need the recording time, location, camera settings, direction of view and an unedited sequence before and after the most dramatic frames. Witnesses should also describe sound, weather, duration and the object’s relationship to buildings, hills or clouds.
Independent records can then test the claim. These include air-traffic data, satellite passages, astronomical positions, weather balloons, drone activity, lightning observations, meteor reports and scheduled launches. Multiple videos are valuable only when they come from separated locations and allow triangulation; ten reposts of one clip remain one source.
A credible unresolved case would ideally combine several forms of evidence: simultaneous observation from different positions, preserved metadata, radar or other sensor records, identifiable environmental conditions and a documented chain of custody. Indonesia’s most famous cases do not currently meet that standard in the publicly accessible record.
Archives, institutions and missing records
Indonesia has no widely accessible central government portal dedicated to UFO or unidentified anomalous phenomena reports. Historical material is dispersed across books, newspaper archives, personal collections, enthusiast databases and interviews. Organisational changes also complicate research: LAPAN was integrated into the National Research and Innovation Agency, making old institutional references harder to follow across changing websites and catalogues.
BETA-UFO’s archive partially fills this gap. Its database includes sighting forms, witness narratives and retrospective case summaries, and its longevity makes it central to any study of Indonesian UFO culture. However, readers should distinguish between a database entry and an independently verified event. Some entries reproduce a witness’s account with minimal external confirmation; others offer a tentative conventional explanation; still others draw on reports written many years after the alleged incident.[dokumen.pub]dokumen.pubOpen source on dokumen.pub.
Newspaper archives are similarly uneven. Journalism can preserve dates, names and contemporary reactions, but coverage frequently repeats claims from enthusiasts without obtaining original photographs, expert analysis or official records. Later articles may also revive old stories for entertainment, creating a chain in which several publications appear to corroborate one another while all depend on the same underlying account.
The most valuable future discoveries would therefore be mundane documents rather than dramatic photographs: police station logs from Alor, Air Force records from September 1964, ammunition and casualty reports from the Surabaya area, Salatun’s original correspondence, and early unpublished witness statements. Such material might not solve the incidents, but it would establish what was reported at the time and which details appeared only in later retellings.
Claims, explanations and evidence in Indonesia’s UFO record
No Indonesian UFO case in the public record has been confirmed as an extraterrestrial or non-human vehicle. That does not mean every report has been explained. It means the surviving evidence has not established extraordinary origin.
Confirmed observations with ordinary identification include the 2026 rocket trail and crop formations shown to be compatible with human construction. Illuminated kites, drones, aircraft, satellites and astronomical objects are also well-supported explanations for many classes of report, even when a particular low-quality video cannot be conclusively resolved.[jakartaglobe.id]jakartaglobe.idindonesias ufo sighting explained as chinese rocket trailJakarta GlobeIndonesia's 'UFO' Sighting Explained as Chinese Rocket Trail14 Apr 2026 — A glowing object seen across Indonesia sparked UFO…
Contested historical cases include Alor in 1959 and Surabaya in 1964. Both may preserve sincere testimony about unusual events, but both lack the complete contemporary evidence required to separate observation from later interpretation.
Unresolved low-information cases form the largest category. These involve reports for which the object cannot be identified because crucial data were never recorded or preserved. Calling such an incident unexplained is accurate; treating it as positive evidence of extraterrestrial technology is not.
Debunked or substantially weakened claims include human-made crop circles and viral objects later matched to known aerospace activity. Debunking in this context does not ridicule witnesses. It identifies an explanation that fits the observation better and requires fewer unsupported assumptions.
How to judge an Indonesian UFO report
A useful assessment begins by separating what the witness observed from what the witness concluded. “A white light crossed the eastern sky for two minutes” is an observation. “It was an alien surveillance craft” is an interpretation.
Five questions usually determine the value of a report:
- Was it recorded promptly? Accounts written immediately are less vulnerable to memory changes than stories reconstructed decades later.
- Are there independent witnesses? Witnesses should be interviewed separately before discussing the event with one another.
- Is the original evidence available? Screenshots and edited clips are much weaker than original files with metadata.
- Were ordinary causes checked? Aircraft, drones, balloons, kites, planets, meteors, satellites, launches and atmospheric effects should be tested before exotic explanations.
- Can another investigator reproduce the analysis? Conclusions should not depend on inaccessible evidence or the reputation of one authority.
This standard does not assume that all reports are mistaken. It prevents the word “UFO” from doing more work than the evidence allows.
What Indonesia’s record actually shows
Indonesia’s UFO history is valuable less as proof of alien visitation than as a study of how unexplained experiences are collected, remembered and interpreted across a vast archipelago. Its cases involve military history, remote communities, aviation expertise, news media, popular culture and increasingly sophisticated civilian investigation.
The record also reveals a persistent tension. Enthusiast organisations have preserved testimony that formal institutions might otherwise have lost, yet their archives often inherit the limitations of voluntary reporting: incomplete files, retrospective memories and uncertain provenance. Official scientific bodies have successfully explained some public mysteries, but there is no transparent national system for preserving unresolved incidents in a form suitable for long-term research.
The most responsible position is therefore neither blanket belief nor blanket dismissal. Indonesia has credible evidence that people have repeatedly observed things they could not identify. It also has strong evidence that several spectacular claims arose from human activity or known aerospace phenomena. The famous historical cases remain open primarily because their evidence is incomplete, not because extraordinary technology has been demonstrated.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Really Happened in Indonesia's UFO Cases?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry
Places national UFO histories into an international context, helping readers compare Indonesian cases with other countries.
The UFO Experience
Explains evidence categories and investigative approaches useful for assessing historical Indonesian sightings.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
Provides a careful framework for evaluating military and pilot UFO reports similar to those discussed for Indonesia.
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Introduces foundational investigative standards useful when weighing claims with limited documentary evidence, such as many Indonesian ca...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Endnotes
1.
Source: historia.id
Title: beta di langit indonesia
Link:https://www.historia.id/article/beta-di-langit-indonesia
Source snippet
13 Feb 2024 — AWAL Juli 1959, penduduk Kepulauan Alor geger setelah munculnya kawanan manusia ajaib: tinggi rata-rata 1,8 meter, berkulit...
2.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reported_UFO_sightings
Source snippet
List of reported UFO sightingsDwikora Operation UFO incident, AsiaSurabaya, Indonesia, Officer Jacob Salatun—founder of the National Inst...
3.
Source: tempo.co
Title: 6 bukti ufo sleman bikinan manusia versi lapan 1764350
Link:https://www.tempo.co/sains/6-bukti-ufo-sleman-bikinan-manusia-versi-lapan-1764350
Source snippet
6 Bukti UFO Sleman Bikinan Manusia Versi LAPAN26 Jan 2011 —... Yogyakarta (23/1). Menurut komunitas penggiat UFO UFONESIA, Crop Circle a...
4.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Jacob Salatun
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Salatun
5.
Source: id.scribd.com
Title: Satu Dekade BETA UFO Melacak Fenomena UFO
Link:https://id.scribd.com/doc/132647844/Satu-Dekade-BETA-UFO-Melacak-Fenomena-UFO
Source snippet
Satu Dekade BETA UFO Melacak Fenomena UFO | PDFJ. Salatun, yang telah merintis penelitian UFO di Indonesia sejak tahun 1960-an. Sal...
6.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: UFO sightings in Indonesia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_sightings_in_Indonesia
7.
Source: dokumen.pub
Link:https://dokumen.pub/alor-incident-60-years-of-unknown-1959-2019-indonesia-ufo-network-978-602-71493-5-9.html
8.
Source: tempo.co
Title: crop circle sleman kreasi manusia dengan teknologi bumi 1764300
Link:https://www.tempo.co/sains/crop-circle-sleman-kreasi-manusia-dengan-teknologi-bumi-1764300
9.
Source: tempo.co
Title: sultan pembuat crop circle patut diapresiasi 1763566
Link:https://www.tempo.co/sains/sultan-pembuat-crop-circle-patut-diapresiasi-1763566
10.
Source: scribd.com
Title: Indonesian UFO Case Review 2010
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/49596792/Indonesian-UFO-Case-Review-2010
11.
Source: dokumen.pub
Link:https://dokumen.pub/indonesian-ufo-contact-cases-database-version-09-draft-raw-english-translation.html
12.
Source: tempo.co
Title: media internasional beritakan jejak ufo sleman 1764601
Link:https://www.tempo.co/sains/media-internasional-beritakan-jejak-ufo-sleman-1764601
13.
Source: tempo.co
Title: beta ufo penggemar ufo yang serius 1609053
Link:https://www.tempo.co/gaya-hidup/beta-ufo-penggemar-ufo-yang-serius-1609053
14.
Source: tempo.co
Title: ini ciri jejak ufo asli 1764885
Link:https://www.tempo.co/sains/ini-ciri-jejak-ufo-asli-1764885
15.
Source: tempo.co
Link:https://www.tempo.co/sains/klaim-mahasiswa-pembuat-crop-circle-diragukan-1764478
16.
Source: tempo.co
Link:https://www.tempo.co/sains/komunitas-ufo-yakin-crop-circle-sleman-jejak-ufo-1764780
17.
Source: tempo.co
Title: video crop circle cikarang beredar di youtube nbsp 1741040
Link:https://www.tempo.co/sains/video-crop-circle-cikarang-beredar-di-youtube-nbsp–1741040
18.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Book
19.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesia
20.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Big Sur UFO
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Sur_UFO
21.
Source: id.scribd.com
Title: J Salatun UFO Salah satu masalah dunia masa kin z lib org pdf
Link:https://id.scribd.com/document/438326949/J-Salatun-UFO-Salah-satu-masalah-dunia-masa-kin-z-lib-org-pdf
22.
Source: jakartaglobe.id
Title: indonesias ufo sighting explained as chinese rocket trail
Link:https://jakartaglobe.id/tech/indonesias-ufo-sighting-explained-as-chinese-rocket-trail
Source snippet
Jakarta GlobeIndonesia's 'UFO' Sighting Explained as Chinese Rocket Trail14 Apr 2026 — A glowing object seen across Indonesia sparked UFO...
23.
Source: thejakartapost.com
Link:https://www.thejakartapost.com/life/2021/06/07/not-a-cult-indonesias-biggest-ufo-community-beta-ufo-weighs-in-on-cia-report.html
Source snippet
The Jakarta PostNot a cult: Indonesia's biggest UFO-community BETA...7 Jun 2021 — The community's website contains information about, am...
24.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: ufo alien encounter alor islands indonesia
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/ufo-alien-encounter-alor-islands-indonesia/
25.
Source: thejakartapost.com
Title: not a cult indonesias biggest ufo community beta ufo weighs in on cia report
Link:https://www.thejakartapost.com/life/2021/06/07/not-a-cult-indonesias-biggest-ufo-community-beta-ufo-weighs-in-on-cia-report
26.
Source: ufoconnect.com
Link:https://ufoconnect.com/journalist-profile/jacob-salatun/
27.
Source: nuforc.org
Link:https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=57555
Additional References
28.
Source: youtube.com
Title: He Worked Near the President… And Studied UFOs for 30 Years | UFOs and Indonesia
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KgMOqJnOg
Source snippet
TJP Documentaries: Indonesia's UFO Believers Never Stop Looking...
29.
Source: youtube.com
Title: TJP Documentaries: Indonesia’s UFO Believers Never Stop Looking
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNB5bNlDVWE
Source snippet
BETA UFO, MUNCULNYA ALIEN DI KEPULAUAN ALOR (CloseTheDoor Clips)...
30.
Source: youtube.com
Title: BETA UFO, MUNCULNYA ALIEN DI KEPULAUAN ALOR (Close The Door Clips)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05KRDkxBBHA
Source snippet
What Did I Just See?! Orbs Over Bali | UAP Files Podcast...
31.
Source: youtube.com
Title: What Did I Just See?! Orbs Over Bali | UAP Files Podcast
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_ulpye1rbc
Source snippet
The Edam UFO Incident: Indonesia's Hidden Alien Mystery Part 01...
32.
Source: betausa.com
Link:https://betausa.com/
33.
Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/%40diggingupancientaliens/gunung-padang-atlantis-aliens-and-missinformation-b145f71d21b6
34.
Source: detik.com
Link:https://www.detik.com/jatim/berita/d-8487278/hasil-analisis-beta-ufo-soal-viral-objek-aneh-di-langit-genteng-surabaya
35.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/iapitb/posts/kalian-mungkin-tak-banyak-tahu-kalau-indonesia-memiliki-bapak-ufo-yang-bernama-j/3753754818044471/
36.
Source: indonesiabaik.id
Link:https://indonesiabaik.id/
37.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/thejakartaglobe/posts/indonesias-ufo-sighting-explained-as-chinese-rocket-trail-a-glowing-object-seen-/972765835247523/