South Africa's UFO History Under the Microscope
South Africa has a long and unusually varied UFO history, but its cases do not add up to evidence of extraterrestrial visitation.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Three patterns define the national record. First, reports cluster around periods of public anxiety, media attention or striking atmospheric conditions. Secondly, the most famous cases often lack the original photographs, physical samples, radar records or official files needed for independent testing. Thirdly, several apparently dramatic incidents became less mysterious when astronomers, meteorologists or document researchers examined them. South Africa therefore offers a useful case study in how genuine observation, mistaken identification, folklore and deliberate fabrication can become intertwined.
A century of sightings
South Africa’s earliest major “UFO” episode predates the flying-saucer era. During August and September 1914, newspapers across the Union reported mysterious monoplanes or moving headlights over places including Cape Town, Vryburg, Porterville, Natal and the Transvaal. The sightings occurred as the First World War began and South Africa prepared operations against German South West Africa, encouraging suspicions of enemy reconnaissance. No aircraft, pilot, base or refuelling network was established, however, and some contemporary observers proposed planets or other mistaken identifications. Sociologist Robert Bartholomew later analysed the episode as a collective-scare phenomenon shaped by wartime expectation and rumour.[Wiley Online Library]onlinelibrary.wiley.com1989), The South African Monoplane Hysteria: An Evaluation of the Usefulness of Smelser's Theory of Hysterical Beliefs*. Sociological…
The better-known modern chronology begins in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when several rural cases acquired national publicity. It then shifts towards waves of reported lights over Gauteng and the Free State in the 1990s, followed by mobile-phone videos, social-media photographs and occasional aviation reports in the twenty-first century. The changing form of the evidence matters: earlier cases survive mainly through press clippings and retrospective testimony, whereas newer ones may include images but often lack reliable information about distance, exposure, direction and camera movement.
A selective chronology shows the range:
- 1914: “phantom monoplane” reports spread across several provinces during the opening weeks of the First World War.
- 1971: a changing, luminous object was reported at Braeside farm near Fort Beaufort, where witnesses said police and the farmer fired at it.
- 1972: unusual marks and damage appeared on a school tennis court at Rosmead after reported lights in the area.
- 1991–96: triangular lights, changing luminous forms and a highly publicised police pursuit were reported around Pretoria, Sasolburg and neighbouring districts.
- 2004: a colourful light filmed over Durban was identified by a university physicist as Venus.
- 2015: “flying saucer” shapes photographed over Cape Town were conclusively identified as lenticular clouds.
- 2016: two cargo-aircraft pilots reported a fast-moving green object offshore from Jeffreys Bay; a rescue search found no missing vessel or aircraft, and the object remained unidentified.[wikipedia.org]WikipediaUFO sightings in South AfricaUFO sightings in South Africa
This sequence is not a complete catalogue. It is more useful as a picture of how South African cases differ in evidential value: some are culturally important but poorly documented, some are readily explained, and a small number remain unresolved because the available information is insufficient rather than because it demonstrates extraordinary technology.
The cases that shaped the national story
Fort Beaufort: dramatic testimony, missing records
The Fort Beaufort incident of 26 June 1971 remains one of South Africa’s best-known close-range reports. Farmer Bennie Smit and other witnesses described a luminous or fiery object on Braeside farm that appeared to change colour and location. Police were reportedly called, and both Smit and officers were said to have fired at the object without any obvious effect. The story attracted international attention and became part of local identity, appearing in museum material, tourist writing and business names.[Wikipedia]WikipediaUFO sightings in South AfricaUFO sightings in South Africa
Its evidential weakness is the absence of a secure official file. Later accounts referred to military interest or an investigation by personnel from Grahamstown, but no publicly verifiable report, radar record, projectile recovery or authenticated physical sample has emerged. The case therefore rests chiefly on reported witness behaviour and newspaper-era retellings. Those features make it historically interesting, yet they cannot establish the size, distance or physical nature of the light.
Possible explanations include a bright astronomical object seen through variable atmospheric conditions, a fireball, a distant fire or another light whose apparent movement was produced by changing viewpoints. None is demonstrably proven. “Unexplained” here means that the surviving record is too incomplete to select confidently among ordinary possibilities.
Rosmead: the strongest trace case, but not a controlled investigation
On 12 November 1972, staff at a school near Rosmead in the Eastern Cape discovered damaged areas on a tennis court after unusual lights had reportedly been seen in the district. Accounts describe portions of the asphalt surface as displaced or disturbed, with nearby vegetation also said to have been affected. The incident attracted the attention of UFO writers and later became one of South Africa’s principal alleged “landing trace” cases.[patrickgross.org]ufologie.patrickgross.orgInterestingly, the Rosmead police told Truter "that there were many other UFO reports received from the same area at the same time, inclu…
Rosmead is more tangible than a distant light because something apparently happened to the ground. The problem is that the chain of evidence is weak. There is no widely accessible contemporaneous laboratory report demonstrating unusual heat, radiation, chemical residues or mechanical forces. Most available descriptions descend from press coverage, specialist UFO publications and later summaries rather than a preserved forensic record.
Alternative explanations have included ordinary ground disturbance, weather effects, subsurface water, human activity and damage retrospectively connected to lights seen elsewhere. None has been conclusively demonstrated from the surviving material. The correct classification is therefore contested physical-trace claim, not confirmed landing site.
Pretoria’s 1996 police pursuit
One of the most striking institutional reports occurred before dawn on 28 August 1996. Police officers in the Pretoria area reported a bright object, and a police helicopter reportedly followed the light towards Bronkhorstspruit or Cullinan before abandoning the pursuit as fuel became a concern. Newspaper accounts suggested that large numbers of officers became involved and that video footage existed. Further lights were reported over subsequent nights.[Wikipedia]WikipediaUFO sightings in South AfricaUFO sightings in South Africa
Multiple police witnesses and an aircraft response give the episode more weight than an anonymous sighting. They do not, however, establish the presence of a solid craft. A helicopter chasing a distant light has no reliable visual measure of its range; Venus, a bright star or another object near the horizon can appear to maintain its distance as the observer moves. The lack of released radar data, calibrated imagery and precise flight geometry prevents a decisive reconstruction.
The case illustrates why professional status alone cannot settle an aerial identification. Police and pilots can be valuable witnesses, especially when they record bearings, altitude, weather and instrument data, but they remain subject to the same depth-perception and night-vision limitations as other observers.
Jeffreys Bay: a credible unresolved aviation report
At about 21:30 on 12 December 2016, the captain and co-pilot of a Boeing 737 cargo aircraft flying from Cape Town to Port Elizabeth reported a green object rising past the cockpit roughly ten nautical miles offshore from Jeffreys Bay. According to the National Sea Rescue Institute, it appeared to reach the cloud layer above the aircraft and then descend rapidly. Air traffic control asked rescue personnel to investigate in case an aircraft or vessel was in distress. No missing craft or further sighting was reported.[nsri.org.za]nsri.org.zaincidents at sedgefield plettenberg bay jeffreys bayIncidents at Sedgefield, Plettenberg Bay, Jeffreys Bay:13 Dec 2016 — JEFFREYS BAY:At ・ of an unidentified flying object.A Boeing 737…
A green parachute flare was considered, but rescuers noted that a standard flare would not normally reach the reported altitude. That objection does not eliminate all pyrotechnic, meteorological or perceptual explanations, because the estimated height depended on the pilots’ interpretation of an object whose distance was unknown.
This is one of the better South African reports because it involved trained aircrew, immediate reporting and a documented operational response. It nevertheless remains an observation without recovered material, sensor data or independent triangulation. It is legitimately unresolved, but “unresolved” is not equivalent to “non-human”.
The Kalahari crash claim collapses under scrutiny
The alleged 1989 Kalahari UFO crash is the most sensational story associated with South Africa: an unknown craft supposedly entered the region, was intercepted by South African Air Force fighters, was brought down by an advanced weapon, and yielded wreckage and alien occupants. Some versions place the crash across the border in Botswana, while later retellings disagree over the date, aircraft, weapon, number of beings and destination of the recovered material.
The claim originated through purported military documents rather than an independently witnessed public event. Researchers found serious problems in those papers, including spelling mistakes, terminology and formatting inconsistent with genuine South African military documentation, internal contradictions and an inability to authenticate the alleged officials or administrative trail. Contemporary reporting also recorded South African Air Force rejection of the supposed documents. Even UFO-oriented summaries now commonly classify the incident as a hoax or a story built from forged paperwork.[saairforce.co.za]saairforce.co.zaThe SAAF Forum • View topicThe SAAF Forum • View topic
No verifiable radar record, flight log, wreckage, biological specimen, recovery photograph or authenticated military order has appeared. The story’s expansion over time—particularly the addition of exotic weapons and detailed alien anatomy—has not been accompanied by stronger evidence. On present information, the Kalahari crash belongs in the debunked or unsupported category, not among South Africa’s unresolved sightings.
Its persistence reveals an important feature of UFO folklore. A document with official-looking headings can become more influential than a vague eyewitness account, even when its provenance is unknown. Repetition in books, television programmes and online videos then creates the appearance of multiple sources, although later versions may all derive from the same suspect material.
Why South African regions produce different reports
The national pattern is partly geographical. South Africa combines large, sparsely populated interiors with major urban corridors, extensive commercial aviation and exceptionally clear astronomical viewing conditions. Those settings generate different kinds of sightings.
Gauteng and neighbouring provinces account for many reports of triangular formations, hovering lights and objects apparently pursued from the ground. Dense population increases the number of observers, while airports, military facilities, roads and urban lighting increase the number of possible aircraft, helicopters, advertising devices and visual reflections. Media coverage can also prompt additional reports of similar-looking lights.
The Eastern Cape and Karoo are associated with several classic rural cases, including Fort Beaufort and Rosmead. Dark skies make astronomical objects, meteors and satellite passes unusually conspicuous. At the same time, sparse settlement can reduce the chances of obtaining independent viewing angles, radar confirmation or rapid scientific examination of an alleged trace.
Cape Town and the south-western mountains provide a strong example of meteorological misidentification. In November 2015, smooth disc-like formations above the city triggered UFO speculation online. Meteorologists identified them as lenticular clouds, which form when stable, moist air flows over mountainous terrain and develops standing waves. Their sharply defined, apparently stationary shape closely resembles the popular image of a flying saucer.[sky.com]news.sky.comufo clouds captured hovering over cape town 10340129Residents of Cape Town may have thought they were seeing UFOs in the sky - but instead they were being treated to a special cloud formati…
KwaZulu-Natal and the eastern coastal belt have produced reports of bright, colourful or slowly moving lights. In the 2004 Durban case, Roshnie Naidu filmed a luminous object for an extended period. Arthur Hughes, then a physics professor at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, examined the footage and identified the source as Venus, whose appearance had been enlarged and distorted by camera zoom and atmospheric effects.[IOL]iol.co.zae saw a huge, pulsating, colourful light in the sky…
The regional differences therefore do not necessarily indicate different classes of unknown craft. They more plausibly reflect differences in terrain, population, weather, air traffic, sky darkness and reporting culture.
What official records do—and do not—show
South Africa does not have a publicly visible equivalent of the former United States Project Blue Book or a modern, regularly reporting national UAP office. Individual incidents have involved police, air traffic controllers, the South African Air Force or rescue organisations, but this is not the same as a centralised scientific investigation programme.
The absence of accessible files should not automatically be treated as evidence of concealment. South African military archives have broader access problems, especially for post-1970 records. Historians have reported delays, classification obstacles and incomplete access affecting research across military subjects, not only UFO claims. This makes some historical assertions difficult to verify, but it does not validate them.[defenceWeb]defenceweb.co.zadefence Web Access to defence archives still a battlefield for researchersdefence Web Access to defence archives still a battlefield for researchers
A useful distinction is:
- Officially reported: an agency recorded or acted upon a sighting, as in the Jeffreys Bay rescue response.
- Officially investigated: an agency collected and analysed witness, radar, meteorological or physical evidence.
- Officially unexplained: an investigation was completed and no adequate cause was found.
- Officially confirmed extraordinary: evidence demonstrated technology or material outside known human or natural categories.
Most South African cases never progress beyond the first or second level. The fact that police, pilots or military personnel were involved indicates that the report was taken seriously enough to check; it does not mean authorities concluded that an alien vehicle was present.
Private archives preserve history, not proof
Much of South Africa’s UFO record has survived through private investigators, newspaper collections and specialist publications. Cynthia Hind, a Zimbabwe-based researcher who investigated cases across southern Africa, published UFO Afrinews from 1988 to 2000. Its surviving scans preserve witness narratives, correspondence and regional reports that might otherwise have disappeared.[ufoafrinews.com]ufoafrinews.comOpen source on ufoafrinews.com.
South African enthusiasts also formed organisations and informal reporting networks, including UFO Research of South Africa. Such groups have served an archival function by collecting testimony from people who did not know where to report unusual sightings. Contemporary accounts of local researchers emphasise that many witnesses were reluctant to approach police or newspapers and preferred specialist organisations.[IOL]iol.co.za2006 07 04 ufos in sa arent as rare as you think2006 07 04 ufos in sa arent as rare as you think
These collections are valuable historical sources, but their contents vary greatly in quality. Reports may be based on a witness interview conducted years later, a copied newspaper article, an unexamined photograph or a story received through another investigator. Unless original negatives, timestamps, site measurements and interview records survive, later researchers cannot reliably test the claims.
Private archives are therefore best read as repositories of reports rather than catalogues of verified events. They show what people experienced and believed, how stories circulated, and which incidents attracted attention. They do not by themselves establish what was physically present.
Sorting confirmed and disputed claims from South Africa’s UFO record
The South African material becomes clearer when cases are separated by evidential outcome rather than fame.
Confirmed observations with ordinary explanations
Several events involved real, observable phenomena whose identity was subsequently established:
- The 2004 Durban light was assessed as Venus after examination of the video.
- The 2015 Cape Town “saucers” were lenticular clouds associated with airflow over mountainous terrain.
- Bright fireballs seen across wide parts of South Africa have sometimes been reported as unusual formations before astronomers identified them as bolides—exceptionally bright meteors that may fragment in the atmosphere.[iol.co.za]iol.co.zaArthur Hughes, professor of physics at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, who viewed the video footage, said the object on film was not an…
These explanations do not imply that witnesses fabricated anything. They show that an accurate description of something unusual can coexist with an incorrect interpretation of its distance, size or nature.
Contested cases with insufficient evidence
Fort Beaufort, Rosmead, the 1996 Pretoria episode and the 2016 Jeffreys Bay report retain unresolved elements. Their witnesses may have seen something genuinely unfamiliar, and some involved police, pilots or apparent physical effects. Yet each lacks one or more decisive forms of evidence: authenticated records, preserved samples, calibrated imagery, radar data or independent positional measurements.
Such cases should remain open in the limited sense that no explanation can be proved from the surviving evidence. They should not be promoted as confirmed spacecraft encounters.
Debunked or severely discredited claims
The Kalahari crash documents are the clearest example. Their provenance, language and internal consistency failed scrutiny, while no independent physical or archival support appeared. The story’s most elaborate features rest on later repetition rather than primary evidence.[saairforce.co.za]saairforce.co.zaThe SAAF Forum • View topicThe SAAF Forum • View topic
Other weak claims include photographs containing only indistinct lights, stories that emerge decades after the alleged event, and accounts whose details change with each retelling. These may remain part of popular culture, but they have little investigative value.
How to judge a South African UFO report
A credible assessment begins by separating the observation from the proposed explanation. “A green light rose past an aircraft” is an observation claim; “it was an extraterrestrial vehicle” is an interpretation requiring much more evidence.
The most useful questions are:
- Was the report recorded immediately? Contemporary statements are generally more reliable than memories reconstructed years later.
- Are there independent witnesses? Several people standing together are not fully independent because they can influence one another.
- Is the object’s distance known? Without range, apparent speed and size cannot be calculated.
- Do radar, flight-tracking or astronomical records exist? Correlated sensor data can distinguish aircraft, satellites and celestial objects from genuinely anomalous movement.
- Are original files preserved? A first-generation photograph or video with metadata is far more useful than a compressed social-media copy.
- Were weather and sky conditions checked? Venus, bright stars, meteors, balloons, lenticular clouds and satellite trains can all appear extraordinary under unfamiliar viewing conditions.
- Is there a documented chain of custody for physical evidence? Material collected without recorded handling, location and laboratory procedures cannot support strong conclusions.
Modern scientific proposals for studying unidentified aerial phenomena emphasise simultaneous measurements from multiple instruments: wide- and narrow-field cameras, radar, radio receivers, acoustic sensors and environmental monitors. This approach is designed to identify optical artefacts and ordinary objects while preserving enough data to analyse a genuinely unusual event.[arXiv]arxiv.orgOpen source on arxiv.org.
South Africa is well suited to that kind of work because of its astronomical infrastructure, extensive dark-sky regions and active aviation network. What has been missing from its UFO history is not a supply of stories, but consistent instrumented observation.
What the South African record actually supports
South Africa has produced credible witnesses, culturally important cases and a small number of incidents that remain unidentified on the information available. It has not produced publicly testable evidence of recovered non-human technology, extraterrestrial bodies or aircraft displaying verified impossible performance.
The national archive is uneven rather than empty. Newspaper collections and private UFO publications preserve considerable testimony, while institutional records appear fragmented and difficult to access. That unevenness explains why old cases are repeatedly rediscovered and retold, but it also limits how confidently they can be interpreted.
The most defensible view is neither blanket dismissal nor belief by default. Explained cases demonstrate how convincingly planets, meteors and clouds can imitate extraordinary craft. Hoaxes such as the Kalahari documents show how official-looking material can manufacture a false history. The remaining unresolved reports deserve accurate preservation and careful analysis—but their unresolved status reflects missing evidence, not proof of an alien presence.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Really Happened in South Africa's Skies?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
Provides context for evaluating historical international cases.
UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry
Covers the evolution of official UFO reporting and archives.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Endnotes
1.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1989.tb00107.x
Source snippet
(1989), The South African Monoplane Hysteria: An Evaluation of the Usefulness of Smelser's Theory of Hysterical Beliefs*. Sociological...
2.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: UFO sightings in South Africa
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_sightings_in_South_Africa
3.
Source: iol.co.za
Link:https://iol.co.za/news/eish/2004-07-05-durban-ufo-was-actually-venus-says-prof/
Source snippet
Arthur Hughes, professor of physics at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, who viewed the video footage, said the object on film was not an...
4.
Source: news.sky.com
Title: ufo clouds captured hovering over cape town 10340129
Link:https://news.sky.com/story/ufo-clouds-captured-hovering-over-cape-town-10340129
Source snippet
Residents of Cape Town may have thought they were seeing UFOs in the sky - but instead they were being treated to a special cloud formati...
5.
Source: nsri.org.za
Title: incidents at sedgefield plettenberg bay jeffreys bay
Link:https://www.nsri.org.za/2016/12/incidents-at-sedgefield-plettenberg-bay-jeffreys-bay/
Source snippet
Incidents at Sedgefield, Plettenberg Bay, Jeffreys Bay:13 Dec 2016 — JEFFREYS BAY:At ・ of an unidentified flying object.A Boeing 737...
6.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/htm/faqafrica.htm
Source snippet
Interestingly, the Rosmead police told Truter "that there were many other UFO reports received from the same area at the same time, inclu...
7.
Source: storytel.com
Title: audioblog ufo trace evidence in a south african tennis court 10149142
Link:https://www.storytel.com/tv/podcasts/podcast-ufo-120423/audioblog-ufo-trace-evidence-in-a-south-african-tennis-court-10149142
8.
Source: news24.com
Title: ufo spotted 1 000 feet in sky before hurtling towards earth nsri 20161213
Link:https://www.news24.com/southafrica/news/ufo-spotted-1-000-feet-in-sky-before-hurtling-towards-earth-nsri-20161213
9.
Source: saairforce.co.za
Title: The SAAF Forum • View topic
Link:https://www.saairforce.co.za/forum/viewtopic.php?start=30&t=4764
10.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/1dcj5sk
11.
Source: ufoafrinews.com
Link:https://www.ufoafrinews.com/pdfs/UFO_AFRINEWS01-150.pdf
12.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18566
13.
Source: en.people.cn
Title: cn’UFO Clouds’ Hover Over Cape Town Skies in South Africa
Link:https://en.people.cn/n/2015/1111/c90000-8974376.html
14.
Source: news24.com
Title: ufo mystery has town buzzing 20060522
Link:https://www.news24.com/ufo-mystery-has-town-buzzing-20060522
15.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1dcj2lj/i_never_heard_about_the_kalahari_ufo_crash_before/
16.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/AlienBodies/comments/1dfezjn/kalahari_crash_89_bodies_had_3_fingerstoes/
17.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/147q3he/building_18_at_wright_patterson_af_base/
18.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/1dcj5sk/i_never_heard_about_the_kalahari_ufo_crash_before/
19.
Source: reddit.com
Title: Ariel School UFO Incident
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/HighStrangeness/comments/yjtkuo/ariel_school_ufo_incident_all_71_known_drawings/
20.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/17zbmgd/ive_been_doing_a_bit_of_reading_about_the_ariel/
21.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/ro2f9s/ufos_in_africa/
22.
Source: reddit.com
Title: map of all reported ufo sightings 19062014
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/xfsi5m/map_of_all_reported_ufo_sightings_19062014/
23.
Source: reddit.com
Title: this is a map of all reported ufo sightings
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/odqjef/this_is_a_map_of_all_reported_ufo_sightings/
24.
Source: reddit.com
Title: one of the best ufo photos ever made by national
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/11f7296/one_of_the_best_ufo_photos_ever_made_by_national/
25.
Source: war.gov
Title: 65 hs1 834228961 62 hq 83894 section 10
Link:https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/65_hs1-834228961_62-hq-83894_section_10.pdf
26.
Source: war.gov
Link:https://www.war.gov/UFO/
27.
Source: war.gov
Title: department of war releases unidentified anomalous phenomena files in historic t
Link:https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4480582/department-of-war-releases-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-files-in-historic-t/
28.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Ariel School UFO incident
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_School_UFO_incident
29.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: List of reported UFO sightings
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reported_UFO_sightings
30.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Title: j.1475 682X.1989.tb00107.x
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1989.tb00107.x
31.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps
32.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
33.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/rg-collections
34.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/catalog-bulk-downloads/uap-bulk-download
35.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/photographs
36.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/htm/faqafricaf.htm
37.
Source: saairforce.co.za
Title: The Airforce
Link:https://www.saairforce.co.za/the-airforce/history/sandf-archive
38.
Source: ia600600.us.archive.org
Title: UFOs The Definitive Casebook LQ2
Link:https://ia600600.us.archive.org/10/items/ufos-the-definitive-casebook-lq-2/UFOs_The_Definitive_Casebook_LQ2.pdf
39.
Source: iol.co.za
Link:https://iol.co.za/news/south-africa/2004-07-01-ufo-over-durban-captured-on-video/
Source snippet
e saw a huge, pulsating, colourful light in the sky...
40.
Source: nationalgeographic.com
Link:https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/151109-ufo-clouds-cape-town-lenticular-clouds-weather-science
41.
Source: defenceweb.co.za
Title: defence Web Access to defence archives still a battlefield for researchers
Link:https://defenceweb.co.za/military-history/access-to-defence-archives-still-a-battlefield-for-researchers/
42.
Source: iol.co.za
Title: 2006 07 04 ufos in sa arent as rare as you think
Link:https://iol.co.za/news/south-africa/2006-07-04-ufos-in-sa-arent-as-rare-as-you-think/
43.
Source: nsri.org.za
Title: nsri gordons bay investigates ufo
Link:https://www.nsri.org.za/2026/06/nsri-gordons-bay-investigates-ufo/
44.
Source: nsri.org.za
Title: nsri jeffreys bay medical evacuation operation at sea
Link:https://www.nsri.org.za/2025/08/nsri-jeffreys-bay-medical-evacuation-operation-at-sea/
45.
Source: nsri.org.za
Title: incidents at jeffreys bay and at still bay
Link:https://www.nsri.org.za/2022/05/incidents-at-jeffreys-bay-and-at-still-bay/
46.
Source: nsri.org.za
Title: incidents at st francis bay and at storms river tsitisikamma
Link:https://www.nsri.org.za/2021/11/incidents-at-st-francis-bay-and-at-storms-river-tsitisikamma/
47.
Source: sahistory.org.za
Title: Fort Beaufort | South African History Online
Link:https://sahistory.org.za/taxonomy/features/fort-beaufort
48.
Source: nsri.org.za
Title: whale carcass washed up in st francis bay
Link:https://www.nsri.org.za/2016/10/whale-carcass-washed-up-in-st-francis-bay/
49.
Source: blog.education.nationalgeographic.org
Title: ufo clouds are real
Link:https://blog.education.nationalgeographic.org/2015/11/10/ufo-clouds-are-real/
50.
Source: sahistory.org.za
Title: Fort Beaufort | South African History Online
Link:https://sahistory.org.za/place/fort-beaufort
51.
Source: facebook.com
Title: South Africa
Link:https://www.facebook.com/CapeTownJohannesburgSouthAfricanWildMemories/posts/something-to-amuse-you-while-i-get-the-history-of-our-next-town-together-believe/2620955924605565/
52.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/967151658964700/posts/1272689098410953/
53.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/825663274173679/posts/2412601038813220/
54.
Source: nsri.org.za
Title: 37 Jeffreys Bay
Link:https://www.nsri.org.za/buoy-finder/37-jeffreys-bay-37-g33/
Additional References
55.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Sighting with Glowing Light in Durban, South Africa
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3zyQIj80hQ
Source snippet
South Africa UFO history documentary The Most Convincing UFO Story From South Africa: The Kalahari Event Motech...
56.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8L6M2mRcux4
Source snippet
UFO Sighting with Glowing Light in Durban, South Africa - FindingUFO...
57.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0u9ykLxa37A
Source snippet
The UFO Incident That Shocked Ariel School: Telepathic Extraterrestrials (Re-Edit)...
58.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp81r00560r000100010001-0
59.
Source: sahistory.org.za
Link:https://sahistory.org.za/places-audit?field_place_category_target_id=All&field_place_type_target_id=All&field_places_level3_target_id=All&page=11
60.
Source: sahistory.org.za
Link:https://sahistory.org.za/places-audit?field_place_category_target_id=All&field_place_type_target_id=All&field_places_level3_target_id=All&order=title&page=25&sort=desc&spammaster_extra_field_1=&spammaster_extra_field_2=&spammaster_page=form
61.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/WarInAngola/posts/anyone-from-the-saaf-know-about-this-/1169002021931331/
62.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/p/DPoUyiECAIV/
63.
Source: ufomagazines.com
Link:https://www.ufomagazines.com/cenap-report-cenap-cenap-report-no-170/
64.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/2336287406636020/posts/3744085725856174/